Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24085265›Full record

ArticleCalcified tissue international2014

The bone resorption inhibitors odanacatib and alendronate affect post-osteoclastic events differently in ovariectomized rabbits.

Pia Rosgaard Jensen, Thomas Levin Andersen, Brenda L Pennypacker, Le T Duong, Jean-Marie Delaissé

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Calcified tissue international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Continuous treatment with odanacatib for up to 8 years in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density: a phase 2 study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2016
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Cortical Bone Porosity in Rabbit Models of Osteoporosis.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Subchondral Bone Remodeling: A Therapeutic Target for Osteoarthritis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Rabbit as model for osteoporosis research.Journal of bone and mineral metabolism · 2019
    Review
  12. Coupling factors involved in preserving bone balance.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Novel advances in the treatment of osteoporosis.British medical bulletin · 2016
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Molecular and cellular basis of bone resorption.Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2015
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Pia Rosgaard JensenClinical Cell Biology, Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Vejle/Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, Denmark, pia.rosgaard.jensen@rsyd.dk.
Thomas Levin Andersen
Brenda L Pennypacker
Le T Duong
Jean-Marie Delaissé
United States Military Academy · USUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKLillebaelt Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Odanacatib (ODN) is a bone resorption inhibitor which differs from standard antiresorptives by its ability to reduce bone resorption without decreasing bone formation. What is the reason for this difference? In contrast with other antiresorptives, such as alendronate (ALN), ODN targets only the very last step of the resorption process. We hypothesize that ODN may therefore modify the remodeling events immediately following osteoclastic resorption. These events belong to the reversal phase and include recruitment of osteoblasts, which is critical for connecting bone resorption to formation. We performed a histomorphometric study of trabecular remodeling in vertebrae of estrogen-deficient rabbits treated or not with ODN or ALN, a model where ODN, but not ALN, was previously shown to preserve bone formation. In line with our hypothesis, we found that ODN treatment compared to ALN results in a shorter reversal phase, faster initiation of osteoid deposition on the eroded surfaces, and higher osteoblast recruitment. The latter is reflected by higher densities of mature bone forming osteoblasts and an increased subpopulation of cuboidal osteoblasts. Furthermore, we found an increase in the interface between osteoclasts and surrounding osteoblast-lineage cells. This increase is expected to favor the osteoclast-osteoblast interactions required for bone formation. Regarding bone resorption itself, we show that ODN, but not ALN, treatment results in shallower resorption lacunae, a geometry favoring bone stiffness. We conclude that, compared to standard antiresorptives, ODN shows distinctive effects on resorption geometry and on reversal phase activities which positively affect osteoblast recruitment and may therefore favor bone formation.

Indexed as

AlendronateAnimalsBiphenyl CompoundsBone and BonesBone Density Conservation AgentsBone RemodelingBone ResorptionFemaleOsteoclastsOsteogenesisOvariectomyRabbitsAlendronateBiphenyl CompoundsBone Density Conservation Agentsodanacatib

Identifiers

PMID24085265
PMCPMC3899456
OpenAlexW2118361818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.