The Women's Health Initiative--a victory for women and their health.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. The evolutionary ecology of age at natural menopause: implications for public health.Evolutionary human sciences · 2020
   Article
2. Menopausal hormone therapy and cancer: changing clinical observations of target site specificity.Steroids · 2014
   Review
3. The breast cancer epidemic: 10 facts.The Linacre quarterly · 2014
   Article
4. Personal reflections on big science, small science, or the right mix.Circulation research · 2014
   Article
5. Patient perspective: Is intensive screening of women at high risk of breast cancer evidence-based medicine orWomen's health (London, England)
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Menopausal hormone therapy and health outcomes during the intervention and extended poststopping phases of the Women's Health Initiative randomized trials.2013

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as