Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24084549›Full record

ReviewObstetrics and gynecology2013

Prophylaxis and treatment of anthrax in pregnant women.

Dana Meaney-Delman, Sonja A Rasmussen, Richard H Beigi, Marianne E Zotti, Yalonda Hutchings, William A Bower, Tracee A Treadwell, Denise J Jamieson

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Safety of Antimicrobials During Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Antimicrobials Considered for Treatment and Postexposure Prophylaxis of Plague.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. CDC Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Anthrax, 2023.MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Safety of Antimicrobials for Postexposure Prophylaxis and Treatment of Anthrax: A Review.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Plague and Pregnancy: Why Special Considerations Are Needed.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Adult Immunization - Need of the Hour.Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dana Meaney-DelmanCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia; and the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Reproductive Infectious Diseases and Obstetric Specialties, Magee-Women's Hospital of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Sonja A Rasmussen
Richard H Beigi
Marianne E Zotti
Yalonda Hutchings
William A Bower
Tracee A Treadwell
Denise J Jamieson
Magee-Womens Hospital · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo review the safety and pharmacokinetics of antimicrobials recommended for anthrax postexposure prophylaxis and treatment in pregnant women. DATA SOURCES: Articles were identified in the PubMed database from inception through December 2012 by searching the keywords (["pregnancy]" and [generic antibiotic drug name]). Additionally, we searched clinicaltrials.gov and conducted hand searches of references from REPROTOX, TERIS, review articles, and Briggs' Drugs in Pregnancy and Lactation. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Articles included in the review contain primary data related to the safety and pharmacokinetics among pregnant women of 14 antimicrobials recommended for anthrax postexposure prophylaxis and treatment (amoxicillin, ampicillin, chloramphenicol, clindamycin, ciprofloxacin, doripenem, doxycycline, levofloxacin, linezolid, meropenem, moxifloxacin, penicillin, rifampin, and vancomycin). TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND

resultsThe PubMed search identified 3,850 articles for review. Reference hand searching yielded nine additional articles. In total, 112 articles met the inclusion criteria.

conclusionsOverall, safety and pharmacokinetic information is limited for these antimicrobials. Although small increases in risks for certain anomalies have been observed with some antimicrobials recommended for prophylaxis and treatment of anthrax, the absolute risk of these antimicrobials appears low. Given the high morbidity and mortality associated with anthrax, antimicrobials should be dosed appropriately to ensure that antibiotic levels can be achieved and sustained. Dosing adjustments may be necessary for the β-lactam antimicrobials and the fluoroquinolones to achieve therapeutic levels in pregnant women. Data indicate that the β-lactam antimicrobials, the fluoroquinolones, and, to a lesser extent, clindamycin enter the fetal compartment, an important consideration in the treatment of anthrax, because these antimicrobials may provide additional fetal benefit in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy.

Indexed as

Abnormalities, Drug-InducedAnthraxAnti-Infective AgentsFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, Newborn, DiseasesPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsAnti-Infective Agents

Identifiers

PMID24084549
PMCPMC4710136
OpenAlexW2471575768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.