Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24083778›Full record

SynthesisBMC pediatrics2013

Recommendations from a consensus development workshop on the diagnosis of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders in Australia.

Rochelle E Watkins, Elizabeth J Elliott, Amanda Wilkins, Raewyn C Mutch, James P Fitzpatrick, Janet M Payne, Colleen M O'Leary, Heather M Jones, Jane Latimer, Lorian Hayes and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract readConsensus StatementSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pediatrics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A Critique of the New Canadian Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder Guideline.Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry = Journal de l'Academie canadienne de psychiatrie de l'enfant et de l'adolescent · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2014
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Rochelle E WatkinsTelethon Institute for Child Health Research, Centre for Child Health Research, The University of Western Australia, P,O, Box 855, West Perth, WA 6872, Australia. rwatkins@ichr.uwa.edu.au.
Elizabeth J Elliott
Amanda Wilkins
Raewyn C Mutch
James P Fitzpatrick
Janet M Payne
Colleen M O'Leary
Heather M Jones
Jane Latimer
Lorian Hayes
Jane Halliday
Heather D'Antoine
Sue Miers
Elizabeth Russell
Lucinda Burns
Anne McKenzie
Elizabeth Peadon
Maureen Carter
Carol Bower
The Kids Research Institute Australia · AUThe University of Sydney · AUCharles Darwin University · AUMurdoch Children's Research Institute · AUThe George Institute for Global Health · AUThe University of Queensland · AUUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD) are underdiagnosed in Australia, and health professionals have endorsed the need for national guidelines for diagnosis. The aim of this study was to develop consensus recommendations for the diagnosis of FASD in Australia.

methodsA panel of 13 health professionals, researchers, and consumer and community representatives with relevant expertise attended a 2-day consensus development workshop to review evidence on the screening and diagnosis of FASD obtained from a systematic literature review, a national survey of health professionals and community group discussions. The nominal group technique and facilitated discussion were used to review the evidence on screening and diagnosis, and to develop consensus recommendations for the diagnosis of FASD in Australia.

resultsThe use of population-based screening for FASD was not recommended. However, there was consensus support for the development of standard criteria for referral for specialist diagnostic assessment. Participants developed consensus recommendations for diagnostic categories, criteria and assessment methods, based on the adaption of elements from both the University of Washington 4-Digit Diagnostic Code and the Canadian guidelines for FASD diagnosis. Panel members also recommended the development of resources to: facilitate consistency in referral and diagnostic practices, including comprehensive clinical guidelines and assessment instruments; and to support individuals undergoing assessment and their parents or carers.

conclusionsThese consensus recommendations provide a foundation for the development of guidelines and other resources to promote consistency in the diagnosis of FASD in Australia. Guidelines for diagnosis will require review and evaluation in the Australian context prior to national implementation as well as periodic review to incorporate new knowledge.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicAustraliaEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleFetal Alcohol Spectrum DisordersHumansInfant, NewbornMaleMass Screening

Identifiers

PMID24083778
PMCPMC3849849
OpenAlexW1998691566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.