Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24083461›Full record

ReviewProgress in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy2013

Quantitative cw Overhauser effect dynamic nuclear polarization for the analysis of local water dynamics.

John M Franck, Anna Pavlova, John A Scott, Songi Han

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Progress in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 141 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A water-pinning hot spot drives templated tau aggregation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. A water-pinning hotspot drives templated tau aggregation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Hydraulic Activation of the AsLOV2 Photoreceptor.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Water-directed pinning is key to tau prion formation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Polarizing agents beyond pentacene for efficient triplet dynamic nuclear polarization in glass matrices.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2023
    Article
  19. The solid effect of dynamic nuclear polarization in liquids.Magnetic resonance (Gottingen, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

John M FranckDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
Anna Pavlova
John A Scott
Songi Han
University of California, Santa Barbara · US

Funding

Probing early protein aggregation mechanisms and their relationship to disease efDP2OD008702 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI HAN, SONGI · 2011 to 2011
$2.3M
NIH HHS DP2 OD008702
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liquid state Overhauser effect Dynamic Nuclear Polarization (ODNP) has experienced a recent resurgence of interest. The ODNP technique described here relies on the double resonance of electron spin resonance (ESR) at the most common, i.e. X-band (∼10GHz), frequency and ¹H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) at ∼15 MHz. It requires only a standard continuous wave (cw) ESR spectrometer with an NMR probe inserted or built into an X-band cavity. We focus on reviewing a new and powerful manifestation of ODNP as a high frequency NMR relaxometry tool that probes dipolar cross relaxation between the electron spins and the ¹H nuclear spins at X-band frequencies. This technique selectively measures the translational mobility of water within a volume extending 0.5-1.5 nm outward from a nitroxide radical spin probe that is attached to a targeted site of a macromolecule. It allows one to study the dynamics of water that hydrates or permeates the surface or interior of proteins, polymers, and lipid membrane vesicles. We begin by reviewing the recent advances that have helped develop ODNP into a tool for mapping the dynamic landscape of hydration water with sub-nanometer locality. In order to bind this work coherently together and to place it in the context of the extensive body of research in the field of NMR relaxometry, we then rephrase the analytical model and extend the description of the ODNP-derived NMR signal enhancements. This extended model highlights several aspects of ODNP data analysis, including the importance of considering all possible effects of microwave sample heating, the need to consider the error associated with various relaxation rates, and the unique ability of ODNP to probe the electron-¹H cross-relaxation process, which is uniquely sensitive to fast (tens of ps) dynamical processes. By implementing the relevant corrections in a stepwise fashion, this paper draws a consensus result from previous ODNP procedures and then shows how such data can be further corrected to yield clear and reproducible saturation of the NMR hyperpolarization process. Finally, drawing on these results, we broadly survey the previous ODNP dynamics literature. We find that the vast number of published, empirical hydration dynamics data can be reproducibly classified into regimes of surface, interfacial, vs. buried water dynamics.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance SpectroscopyWaterWaterDynamic Nuclear PolarizationHydration dynamicsHydration waterNMR relaxometryOverhauser

Identifiers

PMID24083461
PMCPMC3798041
OpenAlexW2015604439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.