SynthesisBMC surgery2013
Laparoscopic liver resection as a safe and efficacious alternative to open resection for colorectal liver metastasis: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal liver metastasis: an umbrella review.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Open Resection Compared to Mini-Invasive in Colorectal Cancer and Liver Metastases: A Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2021Pooled it
- Mini-invasiveWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2019Pooled it
- Laparoscopic Versus Open Liver Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2017Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal liver metastases.Oncotarget · 2016Pooled it
- Outcomes of robotic vs laparoscopic hepatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2015Pooled it
- Laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy with or without synchronous colectomy for colorectal liver metastasis: a meta-analysis.PloS one · 2014Pooled it
- Open versus minimally invasive liver surgery for colorectal liver metastases (LapOpHuva): a prospective randomized controlled trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2019Trial
- Using the win ratio to compare laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal cancer liver metastases.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2023Article
- Review
- Outcomes and Patient Selection in Laparoscopic vs. Open Liver Resection for HCC and Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis.Cancers · 2023Review
- Left hepatectomy and microwave ablation for bilobar colorectal metastases: video description of a "complicated" robotic approach.Updates in surgery · 2022Article
- Optimizing the Personalized Care for the Management of Rectal Cancer: A Consensus Statement.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2022Article
- The role of the laparoscopic approach in two-stage hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases: a single-center experience.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal liver metastases - short- and long-term outcomes: A systematic review.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2021Article
- Robotic and laparoscopic liver surgery for colorectal liver metastases: an experience from a German Academic Center.World journal of surgical oncology · 2020Article
- Current status of laparoscopic liver resection for the management of colorectal liver metastases.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2020Review
- Laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy for colorectal cancer liver metastases: comparative study with propensity score matching.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2016Article
- Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery for Hepatic Colorectal Metastases.Current colorectal cancer reports · 2016Article
- Long-term survival in laparoscopic vs open resection for colorectal liver metastases: inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity scores.HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2016Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe safety and efficacy of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) remain to be established. A meta-analysis was undertaken to compare LLR and open liver resection (OLR) for CLM with respect to surgical and oncologic outcomes.
methodsAn electronic search was performed to retrieve all relevant articles published in the English language by the end of March 2013. Data were analyzed using Review Manager version 5.0.
resultsA total of 8 nonrandomized controlled studies with 695 subjects were analyzsed. Intra-operative blood loss, the proportion of patients requiring blood transfusion, morbidity and the length of hospital stay were all significantly reduced after LLR. Postoperative recurrence, 5-year overall and disease-free survivals were comparable between two groups.
conclusionsLLR for CLM is safe and efficacious. It improves surgical outcomes and uncompromises oncologic outcomes as compared with OLR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.