Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24083243›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2013

Modeling of the renal kinetics of the AT1 receptor specific PET radioligand [11C]KR31173.

Nedim C M Gulaldi, Jinsong Xia, Tao Feng, Kelvin Hong, William B Mathews, Dawn Ruben, Ihab R Kamel, Benjamin M W Tsui, Zsolt Szabo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Total-Body Quantitative Parametric Imaging of Early Kinetics ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2021
    Article
  4. NovelACS omega · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nedim C M GulaldiRussell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Jinsong Xia
Tao Feng
Kelvin Hong
William B Mathews
Dawn Ruben
Ihab R Kamel
Benjamin M W Tsui
Zsolt Szabo

Funding

INVESTIGATION OF ANG II/AT1 RECEPTORS WITH PETR01DK050183 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SZABO, ZSOLT · 1997 to 2011
$3.2M
Shared Instrumentation GrantS10RR022528 · NCRR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SZABO, ZSOLT · 2007 to 2007
$274k
NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR022528NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR022528-01A1NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK050183NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK050183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe radioligand [(11)C]KR31173 has been introduced for PET imaging of the angiotensin II subtype 1 receptor (AT1R). The purpose of the present project was to employ and validate a compartmental model for quantification of the kinetics of this radioligand in a porcine model of renal ischemia followed by reperfusion (IR). PROCEDURES: Ten domestic pigs were included in the study: five controls and five experimental animals with IR of the left kidney. To achieve IR, acute ischemia was created with a balloon inserted into the left renal artery and inflated for 60 minutes. Reperfusion was achieved by deflation and removal of the balloon. Blood chemistries, urine specific gravity and PH values, and circulating hormones of the renin angiotensin system were measured and PET imaging was performed one week after IR. Cortical time-activity curves obtained from a 90 min [(11)C]KR31173 dynamic PET study were processed with a compartmental model that included two tissue compartments connected in parallel. Radioligand binding quantified by radioligand retention (80 min value to maximum value ratio) was compared to the binding parameters derived from the compartmental model. A binding ratio was calculated as DVR = DV(S)/DV(NS), where DV(S) and DV(NS) represented the distribution volumes of specific binding and nonspecific binding. Receptor binding was also determined by autoradiography in vitro.

resultsCorrelations between rate constants and binding parameters derived by the convolution and deconvolution curve fittings were significant (r > 0.9). Also significant was the correlation between the retention parameter derived from the tissue activity curve (Y(ret)) and the retention parameter derived from the impulse response function (f(ret)). Furthermore, significant correlations were found between these two retention parameters and DVR. Measurements with PET showed no significant changes in the radioligand binding parameters caused by IR, and these in vivo findings were confirmed by autoradiography performed in vitro.

conclusionsCorrelations between various binding parameters support the concept of the parallel connectivity compartmental model. If an arterial input function cannot be obtained, simple radioligand retention may be adequate for estimation of in vivo radioligand binding.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalPositron-Emission TomographyAngiographyAnimalsAutoradiographyBlood Cell CountHemodynamicsImidazolesKidneyKineticsLigandsRadiopharmaceuticalsReceptor, Angiotensin, Type 1Sus scrofaTetrazoles2-butyl-5-methoxymethyl-6-(1-oxopyridin-2-yl)-3-((2'-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)bipohenyl-4-yl)methyl)-3H-imidazo(4,5-b)pyridineImidazolesLigandsRadiopharmaceuticalsReceptor, Angiotensin, Type 1Tetrazoles

Identifiers

PMID24083243
PMCPMC3780470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.