The intestinal calcistat: Determinant of clinical vitamin D deficiency.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Comparison of three different daily doses of vitamin D3 in the treatment of nutritional rickets in Indian children under age 5 years: A randomized controlled trial.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2026
   Article
2. Distribution and localization of porcine calcium sensing receptor in different tissues of weaned piglets1.Journal of animal science · 2019
   Article
3. CaOncotarget · 2017
   Review
4. Estimation of magnesium in patients with functional hypoparathyroidism.Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolism · 2014
   Article
5. Calcium Supplementation: Why, Which, and How?Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolism
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.