Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24082798›Full record

ArticlePatient related outcome measures2013

Symptom burden and job absenteeism after treatment with additional catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep vein thrombosis.

Tone Enden, Nils-Einar Kløw, Per Morten Sandset

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient related outcome measures, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00251771 (Catheter-directed Venous Thrombolysis in Acute Iliofemoral Vein Thrombosis, an Open Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00251771 nacompletednot on this map

Catheter-directed Venous Thrombolysis in Acute Iliofemoral Vein Thrombosis, an Open Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorOslo University HospitalRan2006 to 2014Enrolled209ConditionsDeep Vein ThrombosisArmscatheter-directed venous thrombolysis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Angioplasty or stenting for deep venous thrombosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tone EndenDepartment of Hematology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway ; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway ; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Nils-Einar Kløw
Per Morten Sandset
Oslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAdditional catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) for acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) reduces long-term postthrombotic syndrome and is likely to represent a cost-effective alternative treatment compared to the standard treatment of anticoagulation and elastic compression stockings. Accelerated thrombus resolution has also been suggested to improve symptoms and patient function in the acute phase. We aimed to investigate whether additional CDT led to fewer symptoms and job absenteeism during the first 6 months after initiation of DVT treatment compared to standard treatment alone.

methodsThe Catheter-directed Venous Thrombolysis (CaVenT) study was a multicenter open label, randomized controlled trial of patients ages 18 years to 75 years with a verified high proximal DVT, <21 days of symptoms, and no apparent bleeding risk. Patients were allocated to additional CDT or to standard treatment only. Symptoms were assessed at baseline and at 6 months using items from the generic and disease-specific quality of life questionnaires EQ-5D and VEINES-QOL/Sym, respectively. Individual data on sickness benefits related to venous thromboembolic disease were obtained from the national welfare service.

resultsA total of 90 patients allocated additional CDT and 99 control patients completed long-term follow-up and were included in the analyses. Twenty-four in the CDT arm and 40 controls received sick leave (P = 0.046). When considering working patients only (54 in the CDT arm and 72 controls) this difference was no longer statistically significant. Mean duration of job absenteeism was 86.4 days (95% confidence interval 59.4-113.5) in the CDT arm and 60.1 days (95% confidence interval 42.3-77.8) in controls (P = 0.072). After 6 months, more controls experienced frequent swelling of the leg compared with those allocated to CDT (47 [49.0%] patients versus 25 [29.4%] patients, respectively, [P = 0.007]).

conclusionThere are limitations to our data, but the findings indicate improved symptom relief and less frequent job absenteeism in patients treated with additional CDT; this expands upon previously established benefits from this treatment.

Indexed as

patient reported outcomespostthrombotic syndromerandomized controlled trialsymptom burdenthrombolytic therapyvenous thrombosis

Identifiers

PMID24082798
PMCPMC3785408
OpenAlexW2009923946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.