Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24081952›Full record

ReviewCirculation2013

Local innervation and atrial fibrillation.

S Rasika Wickramasinghe, Vickas V Patel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Circulation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. 2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  8. Central stress pathways in the development of cardiovascular disease.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Pulmonary vein isolation in a real-world population does not influence QTc interval.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

S Rasika WickramasingheFrom Penn Cardiovascular Institute and Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Vickas V Patel

Funding

The Contribution of Melanocyte-like Cells to Atrial Function and DevelopmentR01HL105734 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CHEN, XIONGWEN · 2011 to 2015
$2.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL105734NHLBI NIH HHS HL114110NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL105734
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AnimalsAtrial FibrillationAutonomic Nervous SystemBrain StemCardiac Pacing, ArtificialCatheter AblationChromogranin AGenetic VariationHeartHeart AtriaHeart Conduction SystemHumansInterstitial Cells of CajalModels, CardiovascularMyocytes, CardiacPeptide FragmentsChromogranin APeptide FragmentsReceptor, Muscarinic M2Receptors, Adrenergic, betavasostatin Iatrial fibrillationganglia, autonomicmodels, animal

Identifiers

PMID24081952
PMCPMC3844530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.