ArticleFolia microbiologica2014
Molecular epidemiology of Clostridium difficile strains from nosocomial-acquired infections.
Article in Folia microbiologica, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ribotyping of Clostridioides difficile in the Liberec Regional Hospital: a tertiary health care facility.Folia microbiologica · 2023Article
- Clostridioides difficile Whole-genome Sequencing Differentiates Relapse With the Same Strain From Reinfection With a New Strain.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze isolates of Clostridium difficile from patients with nosocomial acquired infection in respect to their molecular type and antimicrobial susceptibility. Fifty-nine randomly selected clinical isolates were characterized. Molecular typing was performed by rep-PCR (DiversiLab). Isolates were tested by disk diffusion towards 11 different antibiotics. All isolates were susceptible to metronidazole and vancomycin. Fifty five (93 %) isolates were resistant to erythromycin and fifty six (95 %) exhibited resistance to both clindamycin and moxifloxacin. Twenty rep-PCR types were identified, but most clinical isolates formed four major rep-PCR clusters (A1 24/59, 40 %; A2 20/59, 33 %; A3 5/59, 8 %; A4 3/59, 5 %). These results show high genetic variability, which demonstrate clearly the complexity of the strains of C. difficile and also show an increasing rate of resistance to fluoroquinolones in our region emphasizing the importance of implementing surveillance programs in order to prevent further spread of resistance in C. difficile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24081935What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.