ArticleCellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands)2013
PEGylated liposomal Gemcitabine: insights into a potential breast cancer therapeutic.
Article in Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Organic Nanodelivery Systems as a New Platform in the Management of Breast Cancer: A Comprehensive Review from Preclinical to Clinical Studies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Nucleoside transporters and immunosuppressive adenosine signaling in the tumor microenvironment: Potential therapeutic opportunities.Pharmacology & therapeutics · 2022Review
- Emerging pro-drug and nano-drug strategies for gemcitabine-based cancer therapy.Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2022Review
- MiR-873-5p: A Potential Molecular Marker for Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- Gemcitabine-Loaded Magnetically Responsive Poly(Polymers · 2020Article
- MicroRNAs and Their Influence on the ZEB Family: Mechanistic Aspects and Therapeutic Applications in Cancer Therapy.Biomolecules · 2020Review
- Loss of miR-873 contributes to gemcitabine resistance in triple-negative breast cancer via targeting ZEB1.Oncology letters · 2019Article
- Tumor-specific delivery of gemcitabine with activatable liposomes.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2019Article
- Overcoming tumor cell chemoresistance using nanoparticles: lysosomes are beneficial for (stearoyl) gemcitabine-incorporated solid lipid nanoparticles.International journal of nanomedicine · 2018Review
- Encapsulating a Hydrophilic Chemotherapeutic into Rod-like Nanoparticles of a Genetically Encoded Asymmetric Triblock Polypeptide Improves its Efficacy.Advanced functional materials · 2017Article
- Article
- Self-assembled gemcitabine-gadolinium nanoparticles for magnetic resonance imaging and cancer therapy.Acta biomaterialia · 2016Article
- Core-Shell Nanostars for Multimodal Therapy and Imaging.Theranostics · 2016Article
- Apoptosis induction and anti-cancer activity of LeciPlex formulations.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeNanoencapsulation of chemotherapeutics is an established method to target breast tumors and has been shown to enhance the efficacy of therapy in various animal models. During the past two decades, the nucleoside analog Gemcitabine has been under investigation to treat both recalcitrant and localized breast cancer, often in combination with other chemotherapeutics. In this study, we investigated the chemotherapeutic efficacy of a novel Gemcitabine-encapsulated liposome previously formulated by our group, GemPo, on both sensitive (4T1) and recalcitrant (MDA-MB-231) breast cancer cell lines.
methodsGemcitabine free drug and liposomal Gemcitabine were compared both in vitro and in vivo using breast cancer models.
resultsWe demonstrated that GemPo differently hindered the growth, survival and migration of breast cancer cells, according to their drug sensitivities. Specifically, whereas GemPo was a more potent cytotoxic and apoptotic agent in sensitive breast cancer cells, it more potently inhibited cell migration in the resistant cell line. However, GemPo still acted as a more potent inhibitor of migration, in comparison with free Gemcitabine, irrespective of cell sensitivity. Administration of GemPo in a 4T1-bearing mouse model inhibited tumor growth while increasing mice survival, as compared with free Gemcitabine and a vehicle control. Interestingly, the inclusion of a mitotic inhibitor, Paclitaxel, synergized only with free Gemcitabine in this model, yet was as effective as GemPo alone. However, inclusion of Paclitaxel with GemPo significantly improved mouse survival.
conclusionsOur study is the first to demonstrate the pleiotropic effects of Gemcitabine and Gemcitabine-loaded nanoparticles in breast cancer, and opens the door for a novel treatment for breast cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.