Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24081781›Full record

ReviewNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2013

Epigenetics of neural repair following spinal cord injury.

Elisa M York, Audrey Petit, A Jane Roskams

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Spinal Cord Injury Causes Reduction ofFrontiers in neurology · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Stereotactic injection of shrna GSK-3β-AAV promotes axonal regeneration after spinal cord injury.Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Medical sciences = Hua zhong ke ji da xue xue bao. Yi xue Ying De wen ban = Huazhong keji daxue xuebao. Yixue Yingdewen ban · 2016
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Inflammogenesis of Secondary Spinal Cord Injury.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2016
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. The epigenetics of stroke recovery and rehabilitation: from polycomb to histone deacetylases.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2013
    Review
  19. Looking above but not beyond the genome for therapeutics in neurology and psychiatry: epigenetic proteins and RNAs find a new focus.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elisa M YorkDepartment of Zoology (Life Sciences Institute), Brain Research Institute and International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (iCORD), University of British Columbia, 2350 Health Sciences Blvd, V6T 1Z3, Vancouver, Canada.
Audrey Petit
A Jane Roskams
University of British Columbia · CAInternational Collaboration On Repair Discoveries · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal cord injury results from an insult inflicted on the spinal cord that usually encompasses its 4 major functions (motor, sensory, autonomic, and reflex). The type of deficits resulting from spinal cord injury arise from primary insult, but their long-term severity is due to a multitude of pathophysiological processes during the secondary phase of injury. The failure of the mammalian spinal cord to regenerate and repair is often attributed to the very feature that makes the central nervous system special-it becomes so highly specialized to perform higher functions that it cannot effectively reactivate developmental programs to re-build novel circuitry to restore function after injury. Added to this is an extensive gliotic and immune response that is essential for clearance of cellular debris, but also lays down many obstacles that are detrimental to regeneration. Here, we discuss how the mature chromatin state of different central nervous system cells (neural, glial, and immune) may contribute to secondary pathophysiology, and how restoring silenced developmental gene expression by altering histone acetylation could stall secondary damage and contribute to novel approaches to stimulate endogenous repair.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticHumansNerve RegenerationSpinal CordSpinal Cord Injuries

Identifiers

PMID24081781
PMCPMC3805854
OpenAlexW2054233677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.