Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24081748›Full record

ReviewWiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2013

[Osteoporosis: therapy in interface management].

Peter Mikosch, Markus Gosch

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Peter Mikosch1. Medizinische Abteilung und Ludwig Boltzmann-Institut für Osteologie, Hanusch-Krankenhaus, Heinrich-Collin Str. 30, 1140, Wien, Österreich, peter.mikosch@osteologie.at.
Markus Gosch
Hanusch Hospital · ATLKH Hochsteiermark · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoporosis is defined as a systemic bone disorder with decreased bone strength and an increased susceptibility for fragility fractures. In particular elderly people face an increased fracture risk. Fracture stabilisation by different methods of osteosynthesis and fast remobilisation has become standard procedures after a fragility fracture due to osteoporosis. However, only a small group of patients receive osteoporosis drug therapy with the aim to reduce the rate of further fractures. In literature this has been described as "osteoporosis care gap". In the past, various projects have been performed in order to overcome this problem of osteoporosis care after fragility fractures. The article presents the current problems in daily routine concerning the initiation of an osteoporosis therapy after a fracture. A simple concept of necessary procedures and questions is presented as a possible solution for the interface management of osteoporosis drug therapy after fragility fractures. In addition, current osteoporosis therapies are presented in the view of care for geriatric patients.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorInterdisciplinary CommunicationAgedAged, 80 and overBone Density Conservation AgentsEvidence-Based MedicineHip FracturesHumansOsteoporosisOsteoporotic FracturesPostoperative ComplicationsRisk FactorsSpinal FracturesBone Density Conservation Agents

Identifiers

PMID24081748
OpenAlexW130062177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.