Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24081665›Full record

SynthesisClinical orthopaedics and related research2014

Can regional anesthesia and analgesia prolong cancer survival after orthopaedic oncologic surgery?

Juan P Cata, Mike Hernandez, Valerae O Lewis, Andrea Kurz

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Regional anesthesia is associated with improved metastasis free survival after surgical resection of bone sarcomas.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2023
    Article
  3. Analysis of physical function, muscle strength, and pulmonary function in surgical cancer patients: a prospective cohort study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Juan P CataDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas-MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Box FC13, Houston, TX, 77030, USA, jcata@mdanderson.org.
Mike Hernandez
Valerae O Lewis
Andrea Kurz
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USCleveland Clinic · USOutcomes Research Consortium · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe perioperative period of major oncologic surgery is characterized by immunosuppression, angiogenesis, and an increased load of circulating malignant cells. It is a window period in which cancer cells may seed, invade, and proliferate. Thus, it has been hypothesized that the use of regional anesthesia with the goal of reducing surgical stress and opioid and volatile anesthetic consumption would avoid perioperative immune suppression and angiogenesis and ultimately cancer recurrence. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We performed a systematic review of the literature on the use of regional anesthesia and postoperative analgesia to improve cancer-related survival after oncologic surgery. Our primary topic of interest is survival after orthopaedic oncologic surgery, but because that literature is limited, we also have systematically reviewed the question of survival after breast, gastrointestinal, and genitourologic cancers.

methodsWe searched the PubMed and Embase databases with the search terms: "anesthesia and analgesia", "local neoplasm recurrence", "cancer recurrence", "loco-regional neoplasm recurrence", "disease-free survival", and "cumulative survival rates". Our initial search of the two databases provided 836 studies of which 693 were rejected. Of the remaining 143 studies, only 13 articles qualified for inclusion in this systematic review, based on defined inclusion criteria. All these studies had retrospective design. Due to the high heterogeneity among the identified studies and the complete absence of randomized controlled trials from the literature on this topic, the results of a meta-analysis would be heavily confounded; hence, we instead performed a systematic review of the literature.

resultsNo eligible studies addressed the question of whether regional anesthesia and analgesia have an impact on survival after musculoskeletal cancer surgery. Only one relevant clinical study was identified on regional breast cancer survival; it suggested a benefit. The literature on gastrointestinal and genitourinary surgery was larger but mixed, although some preliminary studies do suggest a benefit of regional anesthesia on survival after oncologic surgery in those patient populations.

conclusionsAlthough basic science studies suggest a potential benefit of regional anesthesia and stress response reduction in cancer formation, we found little clinical evidence to support the theory that regional anesthesia and analgesia improve overall patient survival after oncologic surgery.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaAnesthesia, ConductionSurgical Procedures, OperativeDisease-Free SurvivalDisease ProgressionHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasmsPostoperative PainRisk FactorsStress, PhysiologicalSurvival AnalysisTime FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID24081665
PMCPMC3971239
OpenAlexW2047736413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.