ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
Content and functional specifications for a standards-based multidisciplinary rounding tool to maintain continuity across acute and critical care.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03911687 (Communicating Narrative Concerns Entered by RNs), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Communicating Narrative Concerns Entered by RNs (CONCERN) Clinical Decision Support (CDS) System
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Standardization of rounds on a general paediatric ward: Implementation of a checklist to improve efficiency, quality of rounds, and family satisfaction.Paediatrics & child health · 2022Article
- The Communicating Narrative Concerns Entered by Registered Nurses (CONCERN) Clinical Decision Support Early Warning System: Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Pragmatic Clinical Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2021Article
- Article
- Protocole of a controlled before-after evaluation of a national health information technology-based program to improve healthcare coordination and access to information.BMC health services research · 2017Article
- Using mobile devices for inpatient rounding and handoffs: an innovative application developed and rapidly adopted by clinicians in a pediatric hospital.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2017Article
- ICU Rounds: "What We've Got Here Is Failure to Communicate".Critical care medicine · 2017Article
- Information Needs Assessment for a Medicine Ward-Focused Rounding Dashboard.Journal of medical systems · 2016Article
- Health Information Technology Coordination to Support Patient-centered Care Coordination.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2015Article
- Clinical Workflow Observations to Identify Opportunities for Nurse, Physicians and Patients to Share a Patient-centered Plan of Care.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMaintaining continuity of care (CoC) in the inpatient setting is dependent on aligning goals and tasks with the plan of care (POC) during multidisciplinary rounds (MDRs). A number of locally developed rounding tools exist, yet there is a lack of standard content and functional specifications for electronic tools to support MDRs within and across settings.
objectiveTo identify content and functional requirements for an MDR tool to support CoC. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe collected discrete clinical data elements (CDEs) discussed during rounds for 128 acute and critical care patients. To capture CDEs, we developed and validated an iPad-based observational tool based on informatics CoC standards. We observed 19 days of rounds and conducted eight group and individual interviews. Descriptive and bivariate statistics and network visualization were conducted to understand associations between CDEs discussed during rounds with a particular focus on the POC. Qualitative data were thematically analyzed. All analyses were triangulated.
resultsWe identified the need for universal and configurable MDR tool views across settings and users and the provision of messaging capability. Eleven empirically derived universal CDEs were identified, including four POC CDEs: problems, plan, goals, and short-term concerns. Configurable POC CDEs were: rationale, tasks/'to dos', pending results and procedures, discharge planning, patient preferences, need for urgent review, prognosis, and advice/guidance. DISCUSSION: Some requirements differed between settings; yet, there was overlap between POC CDEs.
conclusionsWe recommend an initial list of 11 universal CDEs for continuity in MDRs across settings and 27 CDEs that can be configured to meet setting-specific needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.