Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24080700›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Drug discovery2013

Applying insights from biofilm biology to drug development - can a new approach be developed?

Thomas Bjarnsholt, Oana Ciofu, Søren Molin, Michael Givskov, Niels Høiby

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 214 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
214citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
18.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

214 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 507 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Peptide Designs for Use in Caries Management: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

154 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Thomas Bjarnsholt1] Department of International Health, Immunology and Microbiology, Costerton Biofilm Centre Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark. [2] Department of Clinical Microbiology, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Oana Ciofu
Søren Molin
Michael Givskov
Niels Høiby
University of Copenhagen · DKNanyang Technological University · SGTechnical University of Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most of the research on bacterial pathogenesis has focused on acute infections, but much less is known about the pathogenesis of infections caused by bacteria that grow as aggregates in biofilms. These infections tend to be chronic as they resist innate and adaptive immune defence mechanisms as well as antibiotics, and the treatment of biofilm infections presents a considerable unmet clinical need. To date, there are no drugs that specifically target bacteria in biofilms; however, several approaches are in early-stage development. Here, we review current insights into biofilm physiology and pathology, and discuss how a deep insight into the physical and biological characteristics of biofilms can inform therapeutic strategies and molecular targets for the development of anti-biofilm drugs.

Indexed as

Drug DesignAcute DiseaseAdaptive ImmunityAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial InfectionsBiofilmsChronic DiseaseHumansImmunity, InnateMolecular Targeted TherapyAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID24080700
OpenAlexW2057580939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.