Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24079476›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2013

Genome-wide interval mapping using SNPs identifies new QTL for growth, body composition and several physiological variables in an F2 intercross between fat and lean chicken lines.

Olivier Demeure, Michel J Duclos, Nicola Bacciu, Guillaume Le Mignon, Olivier Filangi, Frédérique Pitel, Anne Boland, Sandrine Lagarrigue, Larry A Cogburn, Jean Simon and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Mapping QTLs for Breast Muscle Weight in an FLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Olivier DemeureINRA, UMR1348 PEGASE, 35042 Rennes, France. Olivier.Demeure@rennes.inra.fr.
Michel J Duclos
Nicola Bacciu
Guillaume Le Mignon
Olivier Filangi
Frédérique Pitel
Anne Boland
Sandrine Lagarrigue
Larry A Cogburn
Jean Simon
Pascale Le Roy
Elisabeth Le Bihan-Duval
Physiologie Environnement et Génétique pour l'Animal et les Systèmes d'Elevage · FRBiologie des Oiseaux et Aviculture · FRInstitut Agro Rennes-Angers · FRCommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives · FRInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique · MALaboratoire de Génétique Cellulaire · FRUniversity of Delaware · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor decades, genetic improvement based on measuring growth and body composition traits has been successfully applied in the production of meat-type chickens. However, this conventional approach is hindered by antagonistic genetic correlations between some traits and the high cost of measuring body composition traits. Marker-assisted selection should overcome these problems by selecting loci that have effects on either one trait only or on more than one trait but with a favorable genetic correlation. In the present study, identification of such loci was done by genotyping an F2 intercross between fat and lean lines divergently selected for abdominal fatness genotyped with a medium-density genetic map (120 microsatellites and 1302 single nucleotide polymorphisms). Genome scan linkage analyses were performed for growth (body weight at 1, 3, 5, and 7 weeks, and shank length and diameter at 9 weeks), body composition at 9 weeks (abdominal fat weight and percentage, breast muscle weight and percentage, and thigh weight and percentage), and for several physiological measurements at 7 weeks in the fasting state, i.e. body temperature and plasma levels of IGF-I, NEFA and glucose. Interval mapping analyses were performed with the QTLMap software, including single-trait analyses with single and multiple QTL on the same chromosome.

resultsSixty-seven QTL were detected, most of which had never been described before. Of these 67 QTL, 47 were detected by single-QTL analyses and 20 by multiple-QTL analyses, which underlines the importance of using different statistical models. Close analysis of the genes located in the defined intervals identified several relevant functional candidates, such as ACACA for abdominal fatness, GHSR and GAS1 for breast muscle weight, DCRX and ASPSCR1 for plasma glucose content, and ChEBP for shank diameter.

conclusionsThe medium-density genetic map enabled us to genotype new regions of the chicken genome (including micro-chromosomes) that influenced the traits investigated. With this marker density, confidence intervals were sufficiently small (14 cM on average) to search for candidate genes. Altogether, this new information provides a valuable starting point for the identification of causative genes responsible for important QTL controlling growth, body composition and metabolic traits in the broiler chicken.

Indexed as

Quantitative Trait LociAcetyl-CoA CarboxylaseAnimalsBody CompositionBody WeightChickensCrosses, GeneticGenetic LinkageGenetic VariationGenomeGenotypeModels, StatisticalPolymorphism, Single NucleotideReceptors, GhrelinAcetyl-CoA CarboxylaseReceptors, Ghrelin

Identifiers

PMID24079476
PMCPMC3851061
OpenAlexW1998896231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.