Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24078704›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2013

Optimized atomic statistical potentials: assessment of protein interfaces and loops.

Guang Qiang Dong, Hao Fan, Dina Schneidman-Duhovny, Ben Webb, Andrej Sali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Role of N-glycosylation as a determinant of ATG9A conformations and activity.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Guang Qiang DongDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry and California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences (QB3), University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
Hao Fan
Dina Schneidman-Duhovny
Ben Webb
Andrej Sali

Funding

Core H: MicrobiologyU54GM093342 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI CRONAN, JOHN E. · 2010 to 2015
$34.6M
Theoretical and Computational ApproachesP01GM071790 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI RAUSHEL, FRANK M. · 2004 to 2013
$15.5M
IMP: Software for Hybrid Determination of Macromolecular Assembly StructuresR01GM083960 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SALI, ANDREJ · 2008 to 2024
$5.2M
Protein Modeling by Satisfaction of Spatial RestraintsR01GM054762 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SALI, ANDREJ · 2001 to 2008
$2.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM071790NIGMS NIH HHS GM093342NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM054762NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083960
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationStatistical potentials have been widely used for modeling whole proteins and their parts (e.g. sidechains and loops) as well as interactions between proteins, nucleic acids and small molecules. Here, we formulate the statistical potentials entirely within a statistical framework, avoiding questionable statistical mechanical assumptions and approximations, including a definition of the reference state.

resultsWe derive a general Bayesian framework for inferring statistically optimized atomic potentials (SOAP) in which the reference state is replaced with data-driven 'recovery' functions. Moreover, we restrain the relative orientation between two covalent bonds instead of a simple distance between two atoms, in an effort to capture orientation-dependent interactions such as hydrogen bonds. To demonstrate this general approach, we computed statistical potentials for protein-protein docking (SOAP-PP) and loop modeling (SOAP-Loop). For docking, a near-native model is within the top 10 scoring models in 40% of the PatchDock benchmark cases, compared with 23 and 27% for the state-of-the-art ZDOCK and FireDock scoring functions, respectively. Similarly, for modeling 12-residue loops in the PLOP benchmark, the average main-chain root mean square deviation of the best scored conformations by SOAP-Loop is 1.5 Å, close to the average root mean square deviation of the best sampled conformations (1.2 Å) and significantly better than that selected by Rosetta (2.1 Å), DFIRE (2.3 Å), DOPE (2.5 Å) and PLOP scoring functions (3.0 Å). Our Bayesian framework may also result in more accurate statistical potentials for additional modeling applications, thus affording better leverage of the experimentally determined protein structures. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: SOAP-PP and SOAP-Loop are available as part of MODELLER (http://salilab.org/modeller).

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremModels, StatisticalSoftwareComputational BiologyHydrogen BondingMolecular Docking SimulationProtein ConformationProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID24078704
PMCPMC3842762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.