ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2013
Optimized atomic statistical potentials: assessment of protein interfaces and loops.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
66 citing papers in PubMed.
- Role of N-glycosylation as a determinant of ATG9A conformations and activity.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026Article
- Protein Structural Modeling and Transport Thermodynamics Reveal That Plant Cation-Chloride Cotransporters Mediate Potassium-Chloride Symport.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Parental experiences orchestrate locust egg hatching synchrony by regulating nuclear export of precursor miRNA.Nature communications · 2024Article
- CombFold: predicting structures of large protein assemblies using a combinatorial assembly algorithm and AlphaFold2.Nature methods · 2024Article
- Comprehensive assessment of protein loop modeling programs on large-scale datasets: prediction accuracy and efficiency.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Discriminating physiological from non-physiological interfaces in structures of protein complexes: A community-wide study.Proteomics · 2023Article
- Predicting structures of large protein assemblies using combinatorial assembly algorithm and AlphaFold2.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Modulatory mechanisms of TARP γ8-selective AMPA receptor therapeutics.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Revisiting degron motifs in human AURKA required for its targeting by APC/CLife science alliance · 2023Article
- Comparative Surface Electrostatics and Normal Mode Analysis of High and Low Pathogenic H7N7 Avian Influenza Viruses.Viruses · 2023Article
- Mechanochemical tuning of a kinesin motor essential for malaria parasite transmission.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Structure of the malaria vaccine candidate Pfs48/45 and its recognition by transmission blocking antibodies.Nature communications · 2022Article
- A Benchmark Dataset for Evaluating Practical Performance of Model Quality Assessment of Homology Models.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- HOMELETTE: a unified interface to homology modelling software.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
- Common synaptic phenotypes arising from diverse mutations in the human NMDA receptor subunit GluN2A.Communications biology · 2022Article
- Prediction and Modeling of Protein-Protein Interactions Using "Spotted" Peptides with a Template-Based Approach.Biomolecules · 2022Article
- Recombinant nanobody against MUC1 tandem repeats inhibits growth, invasion, metastasis, and vascularization of spontaneous mouse mammary tumors.Molecular oncology · 2022Article
- A Structural Basis for Inhibition of the Complement Initiator Protease C1r by Lyme Disease Spirochetes.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2021Article
6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationStatistical potentials have been widely used for modeling whole proteins and their parts (e.g. sidechains and loops) as well as interactions between proteins, nucleic acids and small molecules. Here, we formulate the statistical potentials entirely within a statistical framework, avoiding questionable statistical mechanical assumptions and approximations, including a definition of the reference state.
resultsWe derive a general Bayesian framework for inferring statistically optimized atomic potentials (SOAP) in which the reference state is replaced with data-driven 'recovery' functions. Moreover, we restrain the relative orientation between two covalent bonds instead of a simple distance between two atoms, in an effort to capture orientation-dependent interactions such as hydrogen bonds. To demonstrate this general approach, we computed statistical potentials for protein-protein docking (SOAP-PP) and loop modeling (SOAP-Loop). For docking, a near-native model is within the top 10 scoring models in 40% of the PatchDock benchmark cases, compared with 23 and 27% for the state-of-the-art ZDOCK and FireDock scoring functions, respectively. Similarly, for modeling 12-residue loops in the PLOP benchmark, the average main-chain root mean square deviation of the best scored conformations by SOAP-Loop is 1.5 Å, close to the average root mean square deviation of the best sampled conformations (1.2 Å) and significantly better than that selected by Rosetta (2.1 Å), DFIRE (2.3 Å), DOPE (2.5 Å) and PLOP scoring functions (3.0 Å). Our Bayesian framework may also result in more accurate statistical potentials for additional modeling applications, thus affording better leverage of the experimentally determined protein structures. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: SOAP-PP and SOAP-Loop are available as part of MODELLER (http://salilab.org/modeller).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.