Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24078371›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2014

Automated implant segmentation in cone-beam CT using edge detection and particle counting.

Ruben Pauwels, Reinhilde Jacobs, Hilde Bosmans, Pisha Pittayapat, Pasupen Kosalagood, Onanong Silkosessak, Soontra Panmekiate

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Deep learning-based dental implant recognition using synthetic X-ray images.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Intraoperative detection and localization of cylindrical implants in cone-beam CT image data.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ruben Pauwels
Reinhilde Jacobs
Hilde Bosmans
Pisha Pittayapat
Pasupen Kosalagood
Onanong Silkosessak
Soontra Panmekiate

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop a fully automated, accurate and robust segmentation technique for dental implants on cone-beam CT (CBCT) images.

methodsA head-size cylindrical polymethyl methacrylate phantom was used, containing titanium rods of 5.15 mm diameter. The phantom was scanned on 17 CBCT devices, using a total of 39 exposure protocols. Images were manually thresholded to verify the applicability of adaptive thresholding and to determine a minimum threshold value (Tmin). A three-step automatic segmentation technique was developed. Firstly, images were pre-thresholded using Tmin. Next, edge enhancement was performed by filtering the image with a Sobel operator. The filtered image was thresholded using an iteratively determined fixed threshold (Tedge) and converted to binary. Finally, a particle counting method was used to delineate the rods. The segmented area of the titanium rods was compared to the actual area, which was corrected for phantom tilting.

resultsManual thresholding resulted in large variation in threshold values between CBCTs. After applying the edgeenhancing filter, a stable Tedge value of 7.5% was found. Particle counting successfully detected the rods for all but one device. Deviations between the segmented and real area ranged between -2.7 and +14.4mm(2) with an average absolute error of 2.8mm(2). Considering the diameter of the segmented area, submillimeter accuracy was seen for all but two data sets.

conclusionA segmentation technique was defined which can be applied to CBCT data for an accurate and fully automatic delineation of titanium rods. The technique was validated in vitro and will be further tested and refined on patient data.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyDental ImplantsDental ImplantationHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPhantoms, ImagingDental Implants

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.