Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24077970›Full record

Trial reportAIDS and behavior2014

Cognitive and field testing of a new set of medication adherence self-report items for HIV care.

Ira B Wilson, Floyd J Fowler, Carol A Cosenza, Joanne Michaud, Judy Bentkover, Aadia Rana, Laura Kogelman, William H Rogers

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in AIDS and behavior, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 98 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03442192 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

A Comparative Effectiveness Demonstration Project for Linkage and Retention in PrEP Care for Men Who Have Sex With Men (PCA)

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohns Hopkins UniversityRan2018 to 2021Enrolled20ConditionsAdherence, PatientArmsPrEP Care Anywhere Services
NCT03617874 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

PC4PrEP: Integrating Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Into Primary Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlbert Einstein College of MedicineRan2020 to 2022Enrolled22ConditionsHuman Immunodeficiency Virus TransmissionArmsPC4PrEP- Intervention Clinics, Standard of Care Clinics
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ira B Wilson
Floyd J Fowler
Carol A Cosenza
Joanne Michaud
Judy Bentkover
Aadia Rana
Laura Kogelman
William H Rogers

Funding

Translational ScienceP30AI042853 · NIAID · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI LARRY K BROWN · 1998 to 2026
$51.7M
Improving the self-report of medication adherence problems in HIVR01MH092238 · NIMH · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI WILSON, IRA B · 2010 to 2012
$1.1M
Improving the diagnosis and treatment of medication adherence problems in HIVK24MH092242 · NIMH · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI WILSON, IRA B · 2010 to 2014
$937k
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI042853NIMH NIH HHS 2K24MH092242NIMH NIH HHS K24 MH092242NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH092238NIMH NIH HHS R01MH092238
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We conducted four rounds of cognitive testing of self-report items that included 66 sociodemographically diverse participants, then field tested the three best items from the cognitive testing in a clinic waiting room (N = 351) and in an online social networking site for men who have sex with men (N = 6,485). As part of the online survey we conducted a randomized assessment of two versions of the adherence questionnaire-one which asked about adherence to a specific antiretroviral medication, and a second which asked about adherence to their "HIV medicines" as a group. Participants were better able to respond using adjectival and adverbial scales than visual analogue or percent items. The internal consistency reliability of the three item adherence scale was 0.89. Mean scores for the two different versions of the online survey were similar (91.0 vs. 90.2, p < 0.05), suggesting that it is not necessary, in general, to ask about individual medications in an antiretroviral therapy regimen when attempting to describe overall adherence.

Indexed as

CognitionDrug MonitoringHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeSelf ReportAdultHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMassachusettsMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsReproducibility of ResultsRhode IslandSocial SupportSurveys and QuestionnairesViral Load

Identifiers

PMID24077970
PMCPMC4000749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.