ArticleHuman genetics2014
Microarrays as a diagnostic tool in prenatal screening strategies: ethical reflection.
Article in Human genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular Approaches in Fetal Malformations, Dynamic Anomalies and Soft Markers: Diagnostic Rates and Challenges-Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Knowledge about Neonatal Screening among Postpartum Women and Complexity Level of Birthing Facilities.International journal of neonatal screening · 2019Article
- Detection of copy number variants using chromosomal microarray analysis for the prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defects with normal karyotype.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2019Article
- Ethical and counseling challenges in prenatal exome sequencing.Prenatal diagnosis · 2018Article
- Choosing between Higher and Lower Resolution Microarrays: do Pregnant Women Have Sufficient Knowledge to Make Informed Choices Consistent with their Attitude?Journal of genetic counseling · 2018Article
- Opening Pandora's box?: ethical issues in prenatal whole genome and exome sequencing.Prenatal diagnosis · 2018Review
- The Psychological Impact of Prenatal Diagnosis and Disclosure of Susceptibility Loci: First Impressions of Parents' Experiences.Journal of genetic counseling · 2016Article
- Pre- and post-test genetic counseling for chromosomal and Mendelian disorders.Seminars in perinatology · 2016Review
- Comparing genetic counselor's and patient's perceptions of needs in prenatal chromosomal microarray testing.Prenatal diagnosis · 2015Article
- Non-invasive prenatal testing: a review of international implementation and challenges.International journal of women's health · 2015Review
- An exploration of genetic counselors' needs and experiences with prenatal chromosomal microarray testing.Journal of genetic counseling · 2014Article
- Chromosomal Mosaicism in Human Feto-Placental Development: Implications for Prenatal Diagnosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2014Review
- Exome Sequencing in Fetuses with Structural Malformations.Journal of clinical medicine · 2014Review
- The Psychological Challenges of Replacing Conventional Karyotyping with Genomic SNP Array Analysis in Prenatal Testing.Journal of clinical medicine · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genomic microarray analysis is increasingly being applied as a prenatal diagnostic tool. Microarrays enable searching the genome at a higher resolution and with higher sensitivity than conventional karyotyping for identifying clinically significant chromosomal abnormalities. As yet, no clear guidelines exist on whether microarrays should be applied prenatally for all indications or only in selected cases such as ultrasound abnormalities, whether a targeted or genome-wide array should be used, and what these should include exactly. In this paper, we present some ethical considerations on the prenatal use of microarrays. There is a strong consensus, at least in Western countries, that the aim of prenatal screening for foetal abnormalities should be understood as facilitating autonomous reproductive choice for prospective parents. The tests offered should be valid and useful to reach that purpose. Against this background, we address several ethical issues raised by the prenatal application of microarrays. First, we argue that the general distinction between a targeted and a genome-wide microarray needs to be scrutinised. Then we examine whether microarrays are 'suitable tests' to serve either a screening or a diagnostic purpose. Given the wide range of findings possibly generated by microarrays, the question arises whether microarrays actually promote or interfere with autonomous reproductive decision-making. Moreover, if variants of unknown clinical significance are identified, this adds to the burden and complexity of reproductive decision-making. We suggest a qualified use of microarrays in the prenatal context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24077959What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.