Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24077850›Full record

SynthesisBMJ quality & safety2014

Reducing unnecessary urinary catheter use and other strategies to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infection: an integrative review.

Jennifer Meddings, Mary A M Rogers, Sarah L Krein, Mohamad G Fakih, Russell N Olmsted, Sanjay Saint

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ quality & safety, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 136 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
136citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

136 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Incidence of Urinary Tract Infection Among Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

76 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jennifer MeddingsDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, , Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Mary A M Rogers
Sarah L Krein
Mohamad G Fakih
Russell N Olmsted
Sanjay Saint

Funding

Implementing Evidence to Prevent Urinary Infection and Enhance Patient SafetyR01NR010700 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI KREIN, SARAH, SAINT, SANJAY K · 2008 to 2011
$1.7M
Targeting Hospital-Acquired Complications: Impact on the Care of Complex PatientsK08HS019767 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MEDDINGS, JENNIFER ANN · 2010 to 2014
$758k
Predictors of Hospital-Acquired Urinary Tract-Related Bloodstream InfectionR21DK078717 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SAINT, SANJAY K · 2008 to 2009
$418k
AHRQ HHS 1K08-HS019767-01AHRQ HHS 1R010HS018344-01A1AHRQ HHS K08 HS019767NCRR NIH HHS L30 RR026198NIDDK NIH HHS R21 DK078717NIDDK NIH HHS R21-DK078717NINR NIH HHS R01 NR010700NINR NIH HHS R01-NR010700
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCatheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) are costly, common and often preventable by reducing unnecessary urinary catheter (UC) use.

methodsTo summarise interventions to reduce UC use and CAUTIs, we updated a prior systematic review (through October 2012), and a meta-analysis regarding interventions prompting UC removal by reminders or stop orders. A narrative review summarises other CAUTI prevention strategies including aseptic insertion, catheter maintenance, antimicrobial UCs, and bladder bundle implementation.

results30 studies were identified and summarised with interventions to prompt removal of UCs, with potential for inclusion in the meta-analyses. By meta-analysis (11 studies), the rate of CAUTI (episodes per 1000 catheter-days) was reduced by 53% (rate ratio 0.47; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.64, p<0.001) using a reminder or stop order, with five studies also including interventions to decrease initial UC placement. The pooled (nine studies) standardised mean difference (SMD) in catheterisation duration (days) was -1.06 overall (p=0.065) including a statistically significant decrease in stop-order studies (SMD -0.37; p<0.001) but not in reminder studies (SMD, -1.54; p=0.071). No significant harm from catheter removal strategies is supported. Limited research is available regarding the impact of UC insertion and maintenance technique. A recent randomised controlled trial indicates antimicrobial catheters provide no significant benefit in preventing symptomatic CAUTIs.

conclusionsUC reminders and stop orders appear to reduce CAUTI rates and should be used to improve patient safety. Several evidence-based guidelines have evaluated CAUTI preventive strategies as well as emerging evidence regarding intervention bundles. Implementation strategies are important because reducing UC use involves changing well-established habits.

Indexed as

Catheter-Related InfectionsHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicQuality ImprovementReminder SystemsUnnecessary ProceduresUrinary CatheterizationHealth Services ResearchImplementation ScienceInfection ControlPatient SafetyQuality Improvement

Identifiers

PMID24077850
PMCPMC3960353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.