Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24077686›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2014

Timing of code status documentation and end-of-life outcomes in patients admitted to an oncology ward.

Amanda Caissie, Nanor Kevork, Breffni Hannon, Lisa W Le, Camilla Zimmermann

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Early and late code status documentation in cancer patients managed by a dedicated supportive care team.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Resuscitation outcomes in patients with cancer: experience in a large urban cancer centre.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in cancer patients: still some problems to solve.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Do-not-resuscitate orders in cancer patients: a review of literature.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017
    Review
  13. Advance directives in patients with advanced cancer receiving active treatment: attitudes, prevalence, and barriers.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amanda Caissie
Nanor Kevork
Breffni Hannon
Lisa W Le
Camilla Zimmermann

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGuidelines recommend documentation of care preferences for patients with advanced cancer upon hospital admission.We assessed end-of-life outcomes for patients who did or did not have code status (CS) documented within 48 h of admission.

methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of patients who died on an inpatient oncology ward between January 2004 and February 2009. Primary end-of-life outcomes were "code blues" and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) attempts; secondary outcomes included unsuccessful CPR attempts, intensive care unit (ICU), consultations, and ICU admissions. Using logistic regression, outcomes were compared between those with and without CS documentation ≤ 48 h from admission (full code or do-not-resuscitate), controlling for significant confounders.

resultsThe 336 patients had a median age of 61 years; 97 % had advanced cancer. The median time from admission to death was 12 days (range <1-197 days); 151 patients (45 %) had CS documentation ≤ 48 h from admission. Controlling for confounders of reason for admission and marital status, patients with CS documentation ≤ 48 h from admission had fewer "code blues" (2 vs. 15 %; adjusted odds ratio(AOR) 0.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.02-0.43), CPR attempts (1 vs. 11 %; AOR 0.12, 95 % CI 0.01-0.51), unsuccessful CPR attempts (0 vs. 11 %), ICU consultations (9 vs. 30 %; AOR 0.19, 95 % CI 0.08-0.40) and ICU admissions (2 vs. 5 %; AOR 0.18, 95 %CI 0.02-0.85).

conclusionsIn patients who died on an oncology ward, CS documentation within 48 h of admission was associated with less aggressive end-of-life care, regardless of the reason for admission.

Indexed as

Advance DirectivesResuscitation OrdersAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCardiopulmonary ResuscitationCohort StudiesDocumentationFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesTerminal Care

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.