Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24077092›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2013

Causal inference in occupational epidemiology: accounting for the healthy worker effect by using structural nested models.

Ashley I Naimi, David B Richardson, Stephen R Cole

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Perceived Occupational Noise Exposure and Depression in Young Finnish Adults.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Cohort Profile: The International Nuclear Workers Study (INWORKS).International journal of epidemiology · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Are all biases missing data problems?Current epidemiology reports · 2015
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Construct validity of SF-6D health state utility values in an employed population.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ashley I Naimi
David B Richardson
Stephen R Cole

Funding

Virology Research Program (Program 4)P30CA016086 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Deborah F. Tate · 1985 to 2026
$201.5M
Cohort analysis methods for occupational cancer studiesR01CA117841 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI RICHARDSON, DAVID B · 2007 to 2012
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016086NCI NIH HHS R01 CA117841NCI NIH HHS R01CA117841
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a recent issue of the Journal, Kirkeleit et al. (Am J Epidemiol. 2013;177(11):1218-1224) provided empirical evidence for the potential of the healthy worker effect in a large cohort of Norwegian workers across a range of occupations. In this commentary, we provide some historical context, define the healthy worker effect by using causal diagrams, and use simulated data to illustrate how structural nested models can be used to estimate exposure effects while accounting for the healthy worker survivor effect in 4 simple steps. We provide technical details and annotated SAS software (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina) code corresponding to the example analysis in the Web Appendices, available at http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansMaleNeoplasmscausal inferencehealthy worker effectmarginal structural modelsoccupational epidemiologystructural nested models

Identifiers

PMID24077092
PMCPMC3858107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.