Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24076771›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of surgical pathology2013

Cervical squamocolumnar junction-specific markers define distinct, clinically relevant subsets of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.

Michael Herfs, Carlos Parra-Herran, Brooke E Howitt, Anna R Laury, Marisa R Nucci, Sarah Feldman, Cynthia A Jimenez, Frank D McKeon, Wa Xian, Christopher P Crum

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of surgical pathology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Optical techniques for cervical neoplasia detection.Beilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2017
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Michael Herfs*Department of Pathology, Division of Women's and Perinatal Pathology §Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA ‡Department of Pathology, Cedar Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA †Department of Pathology, GIGA-Cancer, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium ∥Genome Institute of Singapore, ASTAR The Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, CT ¶The Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, The University of Connecticut School of Medicine, CT.
Carlos Parra-Herran
Brooke E Howitt
Anna R Laury
Marisa R Nucci
Sarah Feldman
Cynthia A Jimenez
Frank D McKeon
Wa Xian
Christopher P Crum
Perinatal Institute · GBAgency for Science, Technology and Research · SGBrigham and Women's Hospital · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USJackson Laboratory · USUniversity of Liège · BE

Funding

Epithelial Stem Cell ProgramsR01GM083348 · NIGMS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI MCKEON, FRANK D. · 2008 to 2011
$1.5M
Monoclonal Antibodies and Genetic Elements for Airway DiseaseRC1HL100767 · NHLBI · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI MCKEON, FRANK D. · 2009 to 2010
$994k
The squamocolumnar junction and cervical cancerR21CA173190 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI CRUM, CHRISTOPHER PAUL, MCKEON, FRANK D. · 2013 to 2014
$451k
p53 signatures and pelvic serous carcinomaR21CA124688 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI CRUM, CHRISTOPHER PAUL · 2007 to 2009
$420k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA124688NCI NIH HHS R21CA124688NCI NIH HHS R21 CA173190NHLBI NIH HHS RC1 HL100767NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083348NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM083348
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low-grade cervical squamous abnormalities (low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions [LSIL, CIN1]) can be confused with or followed by high-grade (HSIL, CIN2/3) lesions, expending considerable resources. Recently, a cell of origin for cervical neoplasia was proposed in the squamocolumnar junction (SCJ); HSILs are almost always SCJ, but LSILs include SCJ and SCJ subsets. Abnormal cervical biopsies from 214 patients were classified by 2 experienced pathologists (panel) as LSIL or HSIL using published criteria. SILs were scored SCJ and SCJ using SCJ-specific antibodies (keratin7, AGR2, MMP7, and GDA). Assessments of interobserver agreement, p16 staining pattern, proliferative index, and outcome were compared. The original diagnostician agreed with the panel diagnosis of HSIL and SCJ LSIL in all cases (100%). However, for SCJ LSIL, panelists disagreed with each other by 15% and with the original diagnostician by 46.2%. Comparing SCJ and SCJ LSILs, 60.2% and 94.9% were p16 positive, 23% and 74.4% showed strong (full-thickness) p16 staining, and 0/54 (0%) and 8/33 (24.2%) with follow-up had an HSIL outcome, respectively. Some SCJ LSILs are more likely to both generate diagnostic disagreement and be associated with HSIL. Conversely, SCJ LSILs generate little observer disagreement and, when followed, have a very low risk of HSIL outcome. Thus, SCJ biomarkers in conjunction with histology may segregate LSILs with very low risk of HSIL outcome and conceivably could be used as a management tool to reduce excess allocation of resources to the follow-up of these lesions.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBiopsyChi-Square DistributionFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryNeoplasm GradingNeoplasms, Squamous CellObserver VariationPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID24076771
PMCPMC3905241
OpenAlexW1975254805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.