ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
A sea of standards for omics data: sink or swim?
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- What is the real value of omics data? Enhancing research outcomes and securing long-term data excellence.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Modeling community standards for metadata as templates makes data FAIR.Scientific data · 2022Article
- Phase-In to Phase-Out-Targeted, Inclusive Strategies Are Needed to Enable Full Replacement of Animal Use in the European Union.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Consolidating RRI and Open Science: understanding the potential for transformative change.Life sciences, society and policy · 2020Article
- FHIR Genomics: enabling standardization for precision medicine use cases.NPJ genomic medicine · 2020Article
- Using association rule mining and ontologies to generate metadata recommendations from multiple biomedical databases.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2019Article
- Assessing the readiness of precision medicine interoperabilty: An exploratory study of the National Institutes of Health genetic testing registry.Journal of innovation in health informatics · 2017Article
- Beyond the paradigm: Combining mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance for metabolomics.Progress in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy · 2017Review
- Omics-Based Strategies in Precision Medicine: Toward a Paradigm Shift in Inborn Errors of Metabolism Investigations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2016Review
- Laying a Community-Based Foundation for Data-Driven Semantic Standards in Environmental Health Sciences.Environmental health perspectives · 2016Article
- An informatics research agenda to support precision medicine: seven key areas.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2016Article
- Resolving complex research data management issues in biomedical laboratories: Qualitative study of an industry-academia collaboration.Computer methods and programs in biomedicine · 2016Article
- Harnessing next-generation informatics for personalizing medicine: a report from AMIA's 2014 Health Policy Invitational Meeting.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2016Article
- Translational Bioinformatics: Past, Present, and Future.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2016Review
- Methodological challenges and analytic opportunities for modeling and interpreting Big Healthcare Data.GigaScience · 2016Review
- BioSharing: curated and crowd-sourced metadata standards, databases and data policies in the life sciences.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2016Article
- Advancing research in NeuroAIDS using collaboration and public data sharing.BMC medical genomics · 2015Article
- The center for expanded data annotation and retrieval.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2015Article
- SMART on FHIR Genomics: facilitating standardized clinico-genomic apps.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2015Article
- From big data analysis to personalized medicine for all: challenges and opportunities.BMC medical genomics · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the era of Big Data, omic-scale technologies, and increasing calls for data sharing, it is generally agreed that the use of community-developed, open data standards is critical. Far less agreed upon is exactly which data standards should be used, the criteria by which one should choose a standard, or even what constitutes a data standard. It is impossible simply to choose a domain and have it naturally follow which data standards should be used in all cases. The 'right' standards to use is often dependent on the use case scenarios for a given project. Potential downstream applications for the data, however, may not always be apparent at the time the data are generated. Similarly, technology evolves, adding further complexity. Would-be standards adopters must strike a balance between planning for the future and minimizing the burden of compliance. Better tools and resources are required to help guide this balancing act.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.