Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24076585›Full record

ArticleSIGKDD explorations : newsletter of the Special Interest Group (SIG) on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining2012

Sparse Methods for Biomedical Data.

Jieping Ye, Jun Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SIGKDD explorations : newsletter of the Special Interest Group (SIG) on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evolutionary Sparse Learning for Phylogenomics.Molecular biology and evolution · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Robust clinical marker identification for diabetic kidney disease with ensemble feature selection.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019
    Article
  9. Exploring diagnosis and imaging biomarkers of Parkinson's disease via iterative canonical correlation analysis based feature selection.Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Feature Selection Based on Iterative Canonical Correlation Analysis for Automatic Diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease.Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jieping YeArizona State University Tempe, AZ 85287 jieping.ye@asu.edu.
Jun Liu

Funding

Computational Methods for Expression Image AnalysisR01LM010730 · NLM · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI KUMAR, SUDHIR, YE, JIEPING · 2011 to 2013
$934k
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM010730
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following recent technological revolutions, the investigation of massive biomedical data with growing scale, diversity, and complexity has taken a center stage in modern data analysis. Although complex, the underlying representations of many biomedical data are often sparse. For example, for a certain disease such as leukemia, even though humans have tens of thousands of genes, only a few genes are relevant to the disease; a gene network is sparse since a regulatory pathway involves only a small number of genes; many biomedical signals are sparse or compressible in the sense that they have concise representations when expressed in a proper basis. Therefore, finding sparse representations is fundamentally important for scientific discovery. Sparse methods based on the [Formula: see text] norm have attracted a great amount of research efforts in the past decade due to its sparsity-inducing property, convenient convexity, and strong theoretical guarantees. They have achieved great success in various applications such as biomarker selection, biological network construction, and magnetic resonance imaging. In this paper, we review state-of-the-art sparse methods and their applications to biomedical data.

Indexed as

Gaussian graphical modelmagnetic resonance imagingSparse learningstructured sparsity

Identifiers

PMID24076585
PMCPMC3783968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.