Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24076545›Full record

ReviewPharmacological reviews2013

Mu opioids and their receptors: evolution of a concept.

Gavril W Pasternak, Ying-Xian Pan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacological reviews, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 295 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
295citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

295 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Dual-target mu opioid-dopamine DEuropean journal of medicinal chemistry · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Morphine-inducedFrontiers in neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Sex-specific role of the 5-HTNature communications · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

235 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gavril W PasternakMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065. pasterng@mskcc.org.
Ying-Xian Pan

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
TRAINING IN BEHAV. PHARMACOLOGY OF HUMAN DRUG DEPENDENCET32DA007242 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT &ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI HEIL, SARAH H, HIGGINS, STEPHEN T · 1990 to 2025
$8.2M
Synthesis &Pharmacology of Novel Opiates and SystemsR01DA006241 · NIDA · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI PAN, YING-XIAN · 1990 to 2018
$6.4M
PHARMACOLOGY OF OPIOID RECEPTOR SUBTYPESR01DA007242 · NIDA · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI PAN, YING-XIAN · 1991 to 2022
$6.0M
Biochemical Characterization of Opioid ReceptorsR01DA002615 · NIDA · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI PASTERNAK, GAVRIL W · 1985 to 2010
$4.9M
Characterizing exon 11 promoter of the mu opioid receptor gene, OPRMR01DA013997 · NIDA · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI PAN, YING-XIAN · 2002 to 2012
$3.3M
PHARMACOLOGY OF OPIOID RECEPTOR SUBTYPESR37DA007242 · NIDA · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI PASTERNAK, GAVRIL W · 1996 to 2004
$1.5M
Biochemical Characterization of Opioid BInding SitesR56DA002615 · NIDA · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI PASTERNAK, GAVRIL W · 2012 to 2013
$1.1M
OPIATE RECEPTOR PHARMACOLOGYK05DA000220 · NIDA · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI PASTERNAK, GAVRIL W · 1994 to 2008
$1.1M
Exploring functions of mu opioid receptor carboxyl termini by gene targetingR21DA029244 · NIDA · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI PAN, YING-XIAN · 2010 to 2011
$522k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NIDA NIH HHS DA00220NIDA NIH HHS DA013997NIDA NIH HHS DA02615NIDA NIH HHS DA029244NIDA NIH HHS DA06241NIDA NIH HHS DA07242NIDA NIH HHS K05 DA000220NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA002615NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA006241NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA007242NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA013997NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA029244NIDA NIH HHS R37 DA007242NIDA NIH HHS R56 DA002615NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007242
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Opiates are among the oldest medications available to manage a number of medical problems. Although pain is the current focus, early use initially focused upon the treatment of dysentery. Opium contains high concentrations of both morphine and codeine, along with thebaine, which is used in the synthesis of a number of semisynthetic opioid analgesics. Thus, it is not surprising that new agents were initially based upon the morphine scaffold. The concept of multiple opioid receptors was first suggested almost 50 years ago (Martin, 1967), opening the possibility of new classes of drugs, but the morphine-like agents have remained the mainstay in the medical management of pain. Termed mu, our understanding of these morphine-like agents and their receptors has undergone an evolution in thinking over the past 35 years. Early pharmacological studies identified three major classes of receptors, helped by the discovery of endogenous opioid peptides and receptor subtypes-primarily through the synthesis of novel agents. These chemical biologic approaches were then eclipsed by the molecular biology revolution, which now reveals a complexity of the morphine-like agents and their receptors that had not been previously appreciated.

Indexed as

Alternative SplicingAnalgesics, OpioidAnimalsBinding SitesHumansReceptors, Opioid, muAnalgesics, OpioidReceptors, Opioid, mu

Identifiers

PMID24076545
PMCPMC3799236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.