Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24076307›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of urology2014

Measuring and predicting prostate cancer related quality of life changes using EPIC for clinical practice.

Jonathan J Chipman, Martin G Sanda, Rodney L Dunn, John T Wei, Mark S Litwin, Catrina M Crociani, Meredith M Regan, Peter Chang, PROST-QA Consortium

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of urology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03755492 (Initiative to Minimize Disparities in Postoperative Prostate Cancer Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03755492 terminatednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Initiative to Minimize Disparities in Postoperative Prostate Cancer Care

TypeobservationalSponsorAlbert Einstein Healthcare NetworkRan2019 to 2022Enrolled24ConditionsPost ProstatectomyArmsAbsorbent pad for urinary incontinence
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Randomized Trial of Conventional Versus Conventional Plus Fluciclovine (International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2022
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan J ChipmanDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Martin G SandaDepartment of Urology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Rodney L DunnDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
John T WeiDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Mark S LitwinDavid Geffen School of Medicine and Fielding School of Public Health, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Catrina M CrocianiDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Meredith M ReganDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Peter ChangDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: pchang@bidmc.harvard.edu.
PROST-QA Consortium
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USEmory University · USHarvard University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Survivor QOL/Spouse Satisfaction after Prostate TherapyR01CA095662 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SANDA, MARTIN G · 2002 to 2007
$3.3M
Effectiveness of Early Stage Prostate Cancer TreatmentRC1CA146596 · NCI · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI CARROLL, PETER R, SANDA, MARTIN G. · 2009 to 2010
$996k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA095662NCI NIH HHS R01 CA95662NCI NIH HHS RC1 CA146596
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe expanded the clinical usefulness of EPIC-CP (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice) by evaluating its responsiveness to health related quality of life changes, defining the minimally important differences for an individual patient change in each domain and applying it to a sexual outcome prediction model. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn 1,201 subjects from a previously described multicenter longitudinal cohort we modeled the EPIC-CP domain scores of each treatment group before treatment, and at short-term and long-term followup. We considered a posttreatment domain score change from pretreatment of 0.5 SD or greater clinically significant and p ≤ 0.01 statistically significant. We determined the domain minimally important differences using the pooled 0.5 SD of the 2, 6, 12 and 24-month posttreatment changes from pretreatment values. We then recalibrated an EPIC-CP based nomogram model predicting 2-year post-prostatectomy functional erection from that developed using EPIC-26.

resultsFor each health related quality of life domain EPIC-CP was sensitive to similar posttreatment health related quality of life changes with time, as was observed using EPIC-26. The EPIC-CP minimally important differences in changes in the urinary incontinence, urinary irritation/obstruction, bowel, sexual and vitality/hormonal domains were 1.0, 1.3, 1.2, 1.6 and 1.0, respectively. The EPIC-CP based sexual prediction model performed well (AUC 0.76). It showed robust agreement with its EPIC-26 based counterpart with 10% or less predicted probability differences between models in 95% of individuals and a mean ± SD difference of 0.0 ± 0.05 across all individuals.

conclusionsEPIC-CP is responsive to health related quality of life changes during convalescence and it can be used to predict 2-year post-prostatectomy sexual outcomes. It can facilitate shared medical decision making and patient centered care.

Indexed as

ProstatectomyQuality of LifeHumansIntestinal DiseasesLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesProstatic NeoplasmsSexual Dysfunction, PhysiologicalSurveys and QuestionnairesUrologic Diseasesoutcome assessment (health care)prostateprostatic neoplasmsquality of lifequestionnaires

Identifiers

PMID24076307
PMCPMC5006995
OpenAlexW1985329839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.