ArticleJournal of the American College of Cardiology2014
Quality of care for heart failure patients hospitalized for any cause.
Article in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current Trends in Chronic Non-Communicable Disease Management: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Past Two Decades.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024Article
- Treatment outcome and its predictors among patients of acute heart failure at a tertiary care hospital in Ethiopia: a prospective observational study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2020Observational
- Interrupting providers with clinical decision support to improve care for heart failure.International journal of medical informatics · 2019Article
- Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist use after hospitalization of patients with heart failure and post-discharge outcomes: a single-center retrospective cohort study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2019Observational
- Interruptive Versus Noninterruptive Clinical Decision Support: Usability Study.JMIR human factors · 2019Article
- Trends in Hospital Readmission of Medicare-Covered Patients With Heart Failure.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2019Article
- Improving Provider Adherence to Guideline Recommendations in Heart Failure.Current heart failure reports · 2018Review
- Automating Quality Measures for Heart Failure Using Natural Language Processing: A Descriptive Study in the Department of Veterans Affairs.JMIR medical informatics · 2018Article
- Causes and Predictors of In-Hospital Mortality in Patients Admitted with or for Heart Failure at a Tertiary Hospital in Brazil.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2017Article
- Comparison of Approaches for Heart Failure Case Identification From Electronic Health Record Data.JAMA cardiology · 2016Article
- Chronic heart failure: Ca(2+), catabolism, and catastrophic cell death.Biochimica et biophysica acta · 2016Review
- Temporal Trends in Hospitalization for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure in the United States, 1998-2011.American journal of epidemiology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe study sought to assess the quality of care for heart failure patients who are hospitalized for all causes.
backgroundPerformance measures for heart failure target patients with a principal diagnosis of heart failure. However, patients with heart failure are commonly hospitalized for other causes and may benefit from treatments such as angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction.
methodsWe assessed rates of compliance with care measures for patients hospitalized with acute or chronic heart failure in the ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities) study surveillance catchment area from 2005 to 2009. Rates of compliance were compared between patients with a principal discharge diagnosis of heart failure and those with another principal discharge diagnosis.
resultsOf 4,345 hospitalizations of heart failure patients, 39.6% carried a principal diagnosis of heart failure. Patients with a principal heart failure diagnosis had higher rates of LV function assessment (89.1% vs. 82.5%; adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR]: 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04 to 1.10) and discharge ACE inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) in LV dysfunction (64.1% vs. 56.3%; aPR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.20) as compared to patients hospitalized for another cause. LV assessment and ACE inhibitor/ARB use were associated with reductions in 1-year post-discharge mortality (adjusted odds ratio: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.51 to 0.85; adjusted odds ratio: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.54 to 0.96, respectively) that did not differ for patients with versus without a principal heart failure diagnosis.
conclusionsCompared with individuals hospitalized with a principal diagnosis of heart failure, heart failure patients hospitalized for other causes were less likely to receive guideline recommended care. Quality initiatives may improve care by targeting hospitalizations with either principal or secondary heart failure diagnoses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.