Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24076240›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2013

A tympanal insect ear exploits a critical oscillator for active amplification and tuning.

Natasha Mhatre, Daniel Robert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Critical Thing about the Ear's Sensory Hair Cells.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  3. Physiological Basis of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in a Tympanal Ear.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  4. Frequency doubling by activeRoyal Society open science · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Gating of Acoustic Transducer Channels Is Shaped by Biomechanical Filter Processes.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Active auditory mechanics in female black‑horned tree crickets (Oecanthus nigricornis).Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2015
    Article
  9. Critical waves and the length problem of biology.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Active amplification in insect ears: mechanics, models and molecules.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2015
    Review
  12. Mechanical basis of otoacoustic emissions in tympanal hearing organs.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2014
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Natasha MhatreSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1UG, UK. Electronic address: natasha.mhatre@bristol.ac.uk.
Daniel Robert

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/C518522/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A dominant theme of acoustic communication is the partitioning of acoustic space into exclusive, species-specific niches to enable efficient information transfer. In insects, acoustic niche partitioning is achieved through auditory frequency filtering, brought about by the mechanical properties of their ears. The tuning of the antennal ears of mosquitoes and flies, however, arises from active amplification, a process similar to that at work in the mammalian cochlea. Yet, the presence of active amplification in the other type of insect ears--tympanal ears--has remained uncertain. Here we demonstrate the presence of active amplification and adaptive tuning in the tympanal ear of a phylogenetically basal insect, a tree cricket. We also show that the tree cricket exploits critical oscillator-like mechanics, enabling high auditory sensitivity and tuning to conspecific songs. These findings imply that sophisticated auditory mechanisms may have appeared even earlier in the evolution of hearing and acoustic communication than currently appreciated. Our findings also raise the possibility that frequency discrimination and directional hearing in tympanal systems may rely on physiological nonlinearities, in addition to mechanical properties, effectively lifting some of the physical constraints placed on insects by their small size [6] and prompting an extensive reexamination of invertebrate audition.

Indexed as

AcousticsAnimalsAuditory PerceptionBiological EvolutionCell HypoxiaEarEar, MiddleGryllidaeHearingSoundVocalization, Animal

Identifiers

PMID24076240
PMCPMC3793861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.