Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24075927›Full record

ReviewJournal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society2013

Factors controlling the pharmacokinetics, biodistribution and intratumoral penetration of nanoparticles.

Mark J Ernsting, Mami Murakami, Aniruddha Roy, Shyh-Dar Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 315 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
315citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
31.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

315 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 967 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Investigating theBioconjugate chemistry · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. NanoformulatedNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Inhalable perfluorocarbon RNA nanocapsules overcome biological barriers to treat lung metastases.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Nanozyme-Driven Ferroptosis-Cuproptosis Interplay in Lung Cancer.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026
    Review

255 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mark J ErnstingDrug Delivery and Formulation, Drug Discovery Program, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, 101 College Street, Suite 800, Toronto, Ontario M5G 0A3, Canada; Ryerson University, Faculty of Architectural Science and Engineering, Toronto, Ontario M5B 1Z2, Canada.
Mami Murakami
Aniruddha Roy
Shyh-Dar Li
Ontario Institute for Cancer Research · CA

Funding

Stromal depletion for pancreatic cancer therapyR21CA176339 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA · PI FOLTZ, WARREN, HEDLEY, DAVID · 2013 to 2014
$374k
CIHRNCI NIH HHS R21 CA176339
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanoparticle drug delivery to the tumor is impacted by multiple factors: nanoparticles must evade clearance by renal filtration and the reticuloendothelial system, extravasate through the enlarged endothelial gaps in tumors, penetrate through dense stroma in the tumor microenvironment to reach the tumor cells, remain in the tumor tissue for a prolonged period of time, and finally release the active agent to induce pharmacological effect. The physicochemical properties of nanoparticles such as size, shape, surface charge, surface chemistry (PEGylation, ligand conjugation) and composition affect the pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, intratumoral penetration and tumor bioavailability. On the other hand, tumor biology (blood flow, perfusion, permeability, interstitial fluid pressure and stroma content) and patient characteristics (age, gender, tumor type, tumor location, body composition and prior treatments) also have impact on drug delivery by nanoparticles. It is now believed that both nanoparticles and the tumor microenvironment have to be optimized or adjusted for optimal delivery. This review provides a comprehensive summary of how these nanoparticle and biological factors impact nanoparticle delivery to tumors, with discussion on how the tumor microenvironment can be adjusted and how patients can be stratified by imaging methods to receive the maximal benefit of nanomedicine. Perspectives and future directions are also provided.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsDrug Delivery SystemsHumansNanoparticlesNeoplasmsTissue DistributionAntineoplastic AgentsBiodistributionIntratumoral penetrationNanoparticlePharmacokineticsTumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID24075927
PMCPMC3891171
OpenAlexW1963675633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.