Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24075201›Full record

ReviewTrends in ecology & evolution2013

Population genomics of rapid adaptation by soft selective sweeps.

Philipp W Messer, Dmitri A Petrov

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in ecology & evolution, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 249 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
249citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

249 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The persistence and loss of hard selective sweeps amid admixture in ancient Eurasians.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

189 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Philipp W MesserDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. Electronic address: messer@stanford.edu.
Dmitri A Petrov

Funding

Genomic Basis of Vertebrate DiversityP50HG002568 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KINGSLEY, DAVID M · 2002 to 2011
$29.2M
Population Genomics of Adaptive Transposition in DrosophilaR01GM089926 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PETROV, DMITRI · 2010 to 2013
$969k
NHGRI NIH HHS HG002568NHGRI NIH HHS P50 HG002568NIGMS NIH HHS GM089926NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM089926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organisms can often adapt surprisingly quickly to evolutionary challenges, such as the application of pesticides or antibiotics, suggesting an abundant supply of adaptive genetic variation. In these situations, adaptation should commonly produce 'soft' selective sweeps, where multiple adaptive alleles sweep through the population at the same time, either because the alleles were already present as standing genetic variation or arose independently by recurrent de novo mutations. Most well-known examples of rapid molecular adaptation indeed show signatures of such soft selective sweeps. Here, we review the current understanding of the mechanisms that produce soft sweeps and the approaches used for their identification in population genomic data. We argue that soft sweeps might be the dominant mode of adaptation in many species.

Indexed as

MetagenomicsModels, GeneticSelection, GeneticAdaptation, BiologicalMutationPopulation Density

Identifiers

PMID24075201
PMCPMC3834262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.