ArticleAlgorithms for molecular biology : AMB2013
Jaccard index based similarity measure to compare transcription factor binding site models.
Article in Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- Modeling tissue-specific Drosophila metabolism identifies high sugar diet-induced metabolic dysregulation in muscle at reaction and pathway levels.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Functional Interpretation of Omics Data: From Pathways to Networks.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- AmalgaMo: flexible DNA motif merging.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Cross-platform motif discovery and benchmarking to explore binding specificities of poorly studied human transcription factors.Communications biology · 2025Article
- A novel flexible near-infrared endoscopic device that enables real-time artificial intelligence fluorescence tissue characterization.PloS one · 2025Article
- A generative framework for enhanced cell-type specificity in rationally designed mRNAs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- SampleExplorer: using language models to discover relevant transcriptome data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Cross-platform DNA motif discovery and benchmarking to explore binding specificities of poorly studied human transcription factors.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Interconnected lineage trajectories link conventional and natural killer (NK)-like exhausted CD8Communications biology · 2024Article
- Sex differences in physiological response to increased neuronal excitability in a knockin mouse model of pediatric epilepsy.Clinical science (London, England : 1979) · 2024Article
- HOCOMOCO in 2024: a rebuild of the curated collection of binding models for human and mouse transcription factors.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Stage-specific coexpression network analysis of Myc in cohorts of renal cancer.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- A survey on algorithms to characterize transcription factor binding sites.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Review
- A multi-modal machine learning approach to detect extreme rainfall events in Sicily.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- FOXA1 regulates alternative splicing in prostate cancer.Cell reports · 2022Article
- 3DCoop: An approach for computational inference of cell-type-specific transcriptional regulators cooperation in 3D chromatin.STAR protocols · 2022Article
- Interrogating cell type-specific cooperation of transcriptional regulators in 3D chromatin.iScience · 2021Article
- RBPSpot: Learning on appropriate contextual information for RBP binding sites discovery.iScience · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPositional weight matrix (PWM) remains the most popular for quantification of transcription factor (TF) binding. PWM supplied with a score threshold defines a set of putative transcription factor binding sites (TFBS), thus providing a TFBS model.TF binding DNA fragments obtained by different experimental methods usually give similar but not identical PWMs. This is also common for different TFs from the same structural family. Thus it is often necessary to measure the similarity between PWMs. The popular tools compare PWMs directly using matrix elements. Yet, for log-odds PWMs, negative elements do not contribute to the scores of highly scoring TFBS and thus may be different without affecting the sets of the best recognized binding sites. Moreover, the two TFBS sets recognized by a given pair of PWMs can be more or less different depending on the score thresholds.
resultsWe propose a practical approach for comparing two TFBS models, each consisting of a PWM and the respective scoring threshold. The proposed measure is a variant of the Jaccard index between two TFBS sets. The measure defines a metric space for TFBS models of all finite lengths. The algorithm can compare TFBS models constructed using substantially different approaches, like PWMs with raw positional counts and log-odds. We present the efficient software implementation: MACRO-APE (MAtrix CompaRisOn by Approximate P-value Estimation).
conclusionsMACRO-APE can be effectively used to compute the Jaccard index based similarity for two TFBS models. A two-pass scanning algorithm is presented to scan a given collection of PWMs for PWMs similar to a given query. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: MACRO-APE is implemented in ruby 1.9; software including source code and a manual is freely available at http://autosome.ru/macroape/ and in supplementary materials.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.