Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24073110›Full record

ArticleTranslational behavioral medicine2012

Adapting and RE-AIMing a heart disease prevention program for older women with diabetes.

Deborah J Toobert, Russell E Glasgow, Lisa A Strycker, Manuel Barrera, Diane K King

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational behavioral medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Understanding and applying the RE-AIM framework: Clarifications and resources.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Deborah J ToobertOregon Research Institute, 1715 Franklin Blvd., Eugene, OR 97403-1983 USA.
Russell E Glasgow
Lisa A Strycker
Manuel Barrera
Diane K King

Funding

CHD Lifestyle Modification for Latinas with DiabetesR01HL076151 · NHLBI · OREGON RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI TOOBERT, DEBORAH J · 2005 to 2009
$4.7M
Enhancing Support for Women w/Type 2 Diabetes: Follow-UpR01HL077120 · NHLBI · OREGON RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI TOOBERT, DEBORAH J · 2003 to 2007
$3.2M
ENHANCING SUPPORT FOR WOMEN AT RISK FOR HEART DISEASER01HL062156 · NHLBI · OREGON RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI TOOBERT, DEBORAH J · 1999 to 2004
$2.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL062156NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL076151NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL077120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronary heart disease is a pervasive public health problem with a heavy burden among older women. There is a need for developing effective interventions for addressing this problem and for evaluating the dissemination potential of such interventions. A multiple-behavior-change program originally designed for men with heart disease was adapted for women at high risk of heart disease in two randomized clinical trials-the Mediterranean Lifestyle Program and ¡Viva Bien!. Results from these two trials, including readiness for dissemination, are evaluated using the RE-AIM framework in terms of Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance. Program adaptations produced relative high reach as well as consistent and replicated effectiveness and maintenance, and were adopted by a high percentage of primary care offices and clinicians approached. We discuss key findings, lessons learned, future directions for related research, and use of RE-AIM for program development, adaptation, scale-up, and evaluation.

Indexed as

Coronary heart diseaseDiabetesEvaluationLatinoRE-AIM

Identifiers

PMID24073110
PMCPMC3717888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.