Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24072709›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2013

Crystal structure and pharmacological characterization of a novel N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist at the GluN1 glycine binding site.

Trine Kvist, Thomas Bielefeldt Steffensen, Jeremy R Greenwood, Fatemeh Mehrzad Tabrizi, Kasper B Hansen, Michael Gajhede, Darryl S Pickering, Stephen F Traynelis, Jette Sandholm Kastrup, Hans Bräuner-Osborne

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. German Chamomile (International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Structural prediction of GluN3 NMDA receptors.Frontiers in physiology · 2024
    Article
  8. Structural insights into NMDA receptor pharmacology.Biochemical Society transactions · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Structural basis of subunit selectivity for competitive NMDA receptor antagonists with preference for GluN2A over GluN2B subunits.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Guidelines for the successful generation of protein-ligand complex crystals.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2017
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Antinociceptive Activity ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Trine KvistFrom the Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 2, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Thomas Bielefeldt Steffensen
Jeremy R Greenwood
Fatemeh Mehrzad Tabrizi
Kasper B Hansen
Michael Gajhede
Darryl S Pickering
Stephen F Traynelis
Jette Sandholm Kastrup
Hans Bräuner-Osborne
University of Copenhagen · DKEmory University · USSchrodinger (United States) · US

Funding

Mechanism of Action of Novel Subunit-Selective NMDA Receptor ModulatorsR01NS065371 · NINDS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI TRAYNELIS, STEPHEN F · 2009 to 2018
$3.4M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS065371
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

NMDA receptors are ligand-gated ion channels that mediate excitatory neurotransmission in the brain. They are tetrameric complexes composed of glycine-binding GluN1 and GluN3 subunits together with glutamate-binding GluN2 subunits. Subunit-selective antagonists that discriminate between the glycine sites of GluN1 and GluN3 subunits would be valuable pharmacological tools for studies on the function and physiological roles of NMDA receptor subtypes. In a virtual screening for antagonists that exploit differences in the orthosteric binding site of GluN1 and GluN3 subunits, we identified a novel glycine site antagonist, 1-thioxo-1,2-dihydro-[1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-a]quinoxalin-4(5H)-one (TK40). Here, we show by Schild analysis that TK40 is a potent competitive antagonist with Kb values of 21-63 nM at the GluN1 glycine-binding site of the four recombinant GluN1/N2A-D receptors. In addition, TK40 displayed >100-fold selectivity for GluN1/N2 NMDA receptors over GluN3A- and GluN3B-containing NMDA receptors and no appreciable effects at AMPA receptors. Binding experiments on rat brain membranes and the purified GluN1 ligand-binding domain using glycine site GluN1 radioligands further confirmed the competitive interaction and high potency. To delineate the binding mechanism, we have solved the crystal structure of the GluN1 ligand-binding domain in complex with TK40 and show that TK40 binds to the orthosteric binding site of the GluN1 subunit with a binding mode that was also predicted by virtual screening. Furthermore, the structure reveals that the imino acetamido group of TK40 acts as an α-amino acid bioisostere, which could be of importance in bioisosteric replacement strategies for future ligand design.

Indexed as

AnimalsBinding SitesCarrier ProteinsCrystallography, X-RayNerve Tissue ProteinsProtein BindingProtein Structure, TertiaryQuinoxalinesRatsReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateTriazolesXenopus laevis1-thioxo-1,2-dihydro(1,2,4)triazolo(4,3-a)quinoxalin-4(5H)-oneCarrier ProteinsGprin1 protein, mouseNerve Tissue ProteinsQuinoxalinesReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateTriazolesBioisosterCompetitive AntagonistCrystal StructureGlycine SiteIon ChannelsLigand-binding ProteinMolecular PharmacologyNeurotransmitter ReceptorsNMDA ReceptorSchild Analysis

Identifiers

PMID24072709
PMCPMC3829161
OpenAlexW2161211897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.