Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24072703›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2013

Structural determinants of Tau aggregation inhibitor potency.

Kelsey N Schafer, Katryna Cisek, Carol J Huseby, Edward Chang, Jeff Kuret

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Disrupting pathologic phase transitions in neurodegeneration.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The structure and phase of tau: from monomer to amyloid filament.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Analyzing Tau Aggregation with Electron Microscopy.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2016
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kelsey N SchaferFrom the Department of Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210.
Katryna CisekFrom the Department of Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210.
Carol J HusebyFrom the Department of Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210.
Edward ChangFrom the Department of Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210.
Jeff KuretFrom the Department of Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210. Electronic address: kuret.3@osu.edu.

Funding

STRUCTURE AND GENESIS OF TAU FILAMENTSR01AG014452 · NIA · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KURET, JEFF · 1997 to 2009
$2.0M
NIA NIH HHS AG14452NIA NIH HHS R01 AG014452
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small-molecule Tau aggregation inhibitors are under investigation as potential therapeutic agents against Alzheimer disease. Many such inhibitors have been identified in vitro, but their potency-driving features, and their molecular targets in the Tau aggregation pathway, have resisted identification. Previously we proposed ligand polarizability, a measure of electron delocalization, as a candidate descriptor of inhibitor potency. Here we tested this hypothesis by correlating the ground state polarizabilities of cyanine, phenothiazine, and arylmethine derivatives calculated using ab initio quantum methods with inhibitory potency values determined in the presence of octadecyl sulfate inducer under reducing conditions. A series of rhodanine analogs was analyzed as well using potency values disclosed in the literature. Results showed that polarizability and inhibitory potency directly correlated within all four series. To identify putative binding targets, representative members of the four chemotypes were added to aggregation reactions, where they were found to stabilize soluble, but SDS-resistant Tau species at the expense of filamentous aggregates. Using SDS resistance as a secondary assay, and a library of Tau deletion and missense mutants as targets, interaction with cyanine was localized to the microtubule binding repeat region. Moreover, the SDS-resistant phenotype was completely dependent on the presence of octadecyl sulfate inducer, but not intact PHF6/PH6* hexapeptide motifs, indicating that cyanine interacted with a species in the aggregation pathway prior to nucleus formation. Together the data suggest that flat, highly polarizable ligands inhibit Tau aggregation by interacting with folded species in the aggregation pathway and driving their assembly into soluble but highly stable Tau oligomers.

Indexed as

Protein FoldingHumansMutation, MissenseProtein Structure, TertiaryRhodanineSequence DeletionSodium Dodecyl SulfateSolubilitytau ProteinsMAPT protein, humanRhodanineSodium Dodecyl Sulfatetau ProteinsAggregationAlzheimer DiseaseChemical biologyProtein StructureTau

Identifiers

PMID24072703
PMCPMC3820892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.