Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24072529›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2013

Portfolio of clinical research in adult cardiovascular disease as reflected in ClinicalTrials.gov.

Karen P Alexander, David F Kong, Aijing Z Starr, Judith Kramer, Karen Chiswell, Asba Tasneem, Robert M Califf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Adherence to clinical trial registration in countries of Latin America and the Caribbean, 2015.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2018
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. What to Expect From the Evolving Field of Geriatric Cardiology.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2015
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Karen P AlexanderDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC.
David F Kong
Aijing Z Starr
Judith Kramer
Karen Chiswell
Asba Tasneem
Robert M Califf

Funding

Clinical Trials Transformation InitiativeU19FD003800 · FDA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CALIFF, ROBERT · 2009 to 2013
$8.5M
FDA HHS U19 FD003800
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiovascular medicine is widely regarded as a vanguard for evidence-based drug and technology development. Our goal was to describe the cardiovascular clinical research portfolio from ClinicalTrials.gov. METHODS AND

resultsWe identified 40 970 clinical research studies registered between 2007 and 2010 in which patients received diagnostic, therapeutic, or other interventions per protocol. By annotating 18 491 descriptors from the National Library of Medicine's Medical Subject Heading thesaurus and 1220 free-text terms to select those relevant to cardiovascular disease, we identified studies that related to the diagnosis, treatment, or prevention of diseases of the heart and peripheral arteries in adults (n = 2325 [66%] included from review of 3503 potential studies). The study intervention involved a drug in 44.6%, a device or procedure in 39.3%, behavioral intervention in 8.1%, and biological or genetic interventions in 3.0% of the trials. More than half of the trials were postmarket approval (phase 4, 25.6%) or not part of drug development (no phase, 34.5%). Nearly half of all studies (46.3%) anticipated enrolling 100 patients or fewer. The majority of studies assessed biomarkers or surrogate outcomes, with just 31.8% reporting a clinical event as a primary outcome.

conclusionsCardiovascular studies registered on ClinicalTrials.gov span a range of study designs. Data have limited verification or standardization and require manual processes to describe and categorize studies. The preponderance of small and late-phase studies raises questions regarding the strength of evidence likely to be generated by the current portfolio and the potential efficiency to be gained by more research consolidation.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchCardiovascular DiseasesClinical Trials as TopicRegistriesHumansInternetcardiovascular diseasescardiovascular medicineclinical researchclinical trials

Identifiers

PMID24072529
PMCPMC3835214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.