Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24072497›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2014

Rapid detection of resistance in Staphylococcus aureus by using Quicolor ES.

İhsan Hakkı Çiftci, Gülsah Aşik, Halil Er, Engin Karakeçe

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

İhsan Hakkı ÇiftciDepartment of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Sakarya University, Sakarya, 54100, Turkey.
Gülsah Aşik
Halil Er
Engin Karakeçe
Afyon Kocatepe University · TRSakarya University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional microbiological methods are dependent on the growth of microorganisms, and hence require prolonged periods. The methods used to detect resistance in Staphylococcus aureus should have high sensitivity and specificity, yet provide results in a timely manner. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of Quicolor (QC) ES(®) agar for the rapid detection of resistance in S. aureus. We evaluated 100 clinical S. aureus isolates. Resistance detection was performed using traditional microbiological methods. Methicillin resistance detection was evaluated using traditional and molecular microbiological methods. Traditional antibiotic susceptibility testing methods, such as disc diffusion, were conducted using QC ES and Mueller-Hinton (MH) media. The plates were incubated at 36 °C for 5, 6 and 24 h. Rapid results obtained using QC ES agar after 5 h of incubation were consistent with those using the overnight procedure with MH agar for 83 of the 100 S. aureus (including methicillin-susceptible S. aureus) strains. However, the correlation for oxacillin between MH (24 h) and QC ES (5 h) was not satisfactory (r = 0.770). The total agreement between QC ES and MH agar was 83% after 5 h, 89% after 6 h, and 94% after 24 h. The accurate and rapid detection of resistance in S. aureus is critical due to the associated therapeutic problems and infection control measures. We believe that the use of QC ES for S. aureus will reduce the delay in resistance detection, thus providing physicians and infection control practitioners with early information for better management.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialAnti-Bacterial AgentsChromogenic CompoundsCulture MediaHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsSensitivity and SpecificityStaining and LabelingStaphylococcus aureusTime FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsChromogenic CompoundsCulture Media

Identifiers

PMID24072497
OpenAlexW2120961935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.