Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24072457›Full record

ReviewNeurocritical care2014

Cerebral microdialysis in traumatic brain injury and subarachnoid hemorrhage: state of the art.

Marcelo de Lima Oliveira, Ana Carolina Kairalla, Erich Talamoni Fonoff, Raquel Chacon Ruiz Martinez, Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira, Edson Bor-Seng-Shu

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurocritical care, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Overview of Neurovascular Physiology.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2018
    Review
  13. Cerebral Microdialysis in Neurocritical Care.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Management of traumatic brain injury patients.Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2018
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marcelo de Lima OliveiraDivision of Neurological Surgery, Hospital das Clinicas, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Rua Loefgreen, 1.272 - Vila Clementino, São Paulo, SP, 04040-001, Brazil.
Ana Carolina Kairalla
Erich Talamoni Fonoff
Raquel Chacon Ruiz Martinez
Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira
Edson Bor-Seng-Shu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebral microdialysis (CMD) is a laboratory tool that provides on-line analysis of brain biochemistry via a thin, fenestrated, double-lumen dialysis catheter that is inserted into the interstitium of the brain. A solute is slowly infused into the catheter at a constant velocity. The fenestrated membranes at the tip of the catheter permit free diffusion of molecules between the brain interstitium and the perfusate, which is subsequently collected for laboratory analysis. The major molecules studied using this method are glucose, lactate, pyruvate, glutamate, and glycerol. The collected substances provide insight into the neurochemical features of secondary injury following traumatic brain injury (TBI) and subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and valuable information about changes in brain metabolism within a short time frame. In this review, the authors detail the CMD technique and its associated markers and then describe pertinent findings from the literature about the clinical application of CMD in TBI and SAH.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesHumansMicrodialysisSubarachnoid Hemorrhage

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.