ArticleMycorrhiza2014
Cryopreservation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from root organ and plant cultures.
Article in Mycorrhiza, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Alginate-calcium encapsulation of root-associated fungi: viability, storage stability and functional recovery.Archives of microbiology · 2026Article
- Cold storage promotes germination and colonization of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal hyphae as propagules.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Celebrating INVAM: 35 years of the largest living culture collection of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.Mycorrhiza · 2021Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Long-term maintenance of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) by in vitro or in vivo subcultivation is often expensive and time-consuming and could present the risk of contaminations and possibly morphological, physiological, and genetic variations over time. Recently, in vitro produced AMF isolates belonging to the genus Rhizophagus were successfully cryopreserved at -130 °C following encapsulation-drying. Here, this method was tested on 12 single species cultures belonging to six different genera (i.e., Rhizophagus, Glomus, Claroideoglomus, Septoglomus, Paraglomus, and Gigaspora) produced in vitro or in vivo. Their viability was estimated, after 1 month of cryopreservation at -130 °C, by the percentage of potentially infective beads (i.e., the percentage of beads that contained at least one germinated propagule) for the in vitro produced species and the percentage of infective beads (i.e., the percentage of beads that contained at least one propagule able to colonize a new host plant in pot culture) for the in vivo produced species. With the exception of Gigaspora sp. MUCL 52331 and Septoglomus constrictus PER 7.2, no significant differences were observed in the viability of the single species cultures before and after cryopreservation. These results, thus, demonstrated the suitability of the cryopreservation method by encapsulation-drying for AMF species belonging to different genera and produced in vitro or in vivo. This method opens the door to the long-term preservation at ultra-low temperature of a large number of AMF species and for the preservation of species that are still recalcitrant to in vitro cultivation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.