ArticleParkinsonism & related disorders2014
Risky driving and pedunculopontine nucleus-thalamic cholinergic denervation in Parkinson disease.
Article in Parkinsonism & related disorders, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Role of the Central Cholinergic Nervous System in Motor and Non-Motor Symptoms of Parkinson's Disease.Current neuropharmacology · 2025Review
- Molecular Imaging of the Cholinergic System in Parkinson's Disease.International review of neurobiology · 2018Review
- Article
- The Cholinergic System Modulates Memory and Hippocampal PlasticityFrontiers in immunology · 2017Review
- Deficits in cholinergic neurotransmission and their clinical correlates in Parkinson's disease.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIt is unknown whether driving difficulty in Parkinson disease (PD) is attributable to nigrostriatal dopaminergic or extranigral non-dopaminergic neurodegeneration.
objectiveTo investigate in vivo imaging differences in dopaminergic and cholinergic innervation between PD patients with and without a history of risky driving.
methodsThirty non-demented PD subjects (10 women/20 men) completed a driving survey. These subjects had previously undergone (+)-[(11)C] dihydrotetrabenazine vesicular monoamine transporter 2 and [(11)C] methyl-4-piperidinyl propionate acetylcholinesterase PET imaging. Acetylcholinesterase PET imaging assesses cholinergic terminal integrity with cortical uptake largely reflecting basal forebrain and thalamic uptake principally reflecting pedunculopontine nucleus integrity.
resultsEight of thirty subjects reported a history of risky driving (been pulled over, had a traffic citation, or been in an accident since PD onset) while 22 had no such history (safe drivers). There was no difference in striatal dihydrotetrabenazine vesicular monoamine transporter uptake between risky and safe drivers. There was significantly less thalamic acetylcholinesterase activity in the risky drivers compared to safe drivers (0.0513 ± 0.006 vs. 0.0570 ± 0.006, p = 0.022) but no difference in neocortical acetylcholinesterase activity. Using multivariable logistic regression, decreased thalamic acetylcholinesterase activity remained an independent predictor of risky driving in PD even after controlling for age and disease duration.
conclusionsRisky driving is related to pedunculopontine nucleus-thalamic but not neocortical cholinergic denervation or nigrostriatal dopaminergic denervation in PD. This suggests that degeneration of the pedunculopontine nucleus, a brainstem center responsible for postural and gait control, plays a role in the ability of PD patients to drive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.