Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24070396›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2013

Transplacental transfer and distribution of pravastatin.

Tatiana N Nanovskaya, Svetlana L Patrikeeva, Jonathan Paul, Maged M Costantine, Gary D V Hankins, Mahmoud S Ahmed

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The role of statins in the prevention of preeclampsia.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Prevention of preeclampsia.Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine · 2020
    Review
  18. Challenges in conducting clinical research studies in pregnant women.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2020
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tatiana N NanovskayaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX.
Svetlana L Patrikeeva
Jonathan Paul
Maged M Costantine
Gary D V Hankins
Mahmoud S Ahmed
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · US

Funding

Obstetric Pharmacology Research Units Network Center at UTMB-GalvestonU10HD047891 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI AHMED, MAHMOUD S, HANKINS, GARY D · 2004 to 2014
$9.3M
NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD047891NICHD NIH HHS U10-HD 047891
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of the study was to determine the bidirectional transfer of pravastatin across the dually perfused term human placental lobule and its distribution between the tissue and maternal and fetal circuits. STUDY

designThe transfer of pravastatin was determined in the maternal-to-fetal (n = 11) and fetal-to-maternal (n = 10) directions. Pravastatin was coperfused with its [(3)H]-isotope and the marker compound antipyrine (20 μg/mL) and its [(14)C]-isotope. The concentration of pravastatin in the perfused tissue and the maternal and fetal circuits was determined using liquid scintillation spectrometry. Inside-out vesicles prepared from placental brush border membranes were utilized to investigate the role of efflux transporters in the transplacental transfer of pravastatin.

resultsPravastatin was transferred from the maternal to the fetal circuit and vice versa. In the maternal-to-fetal direction, the distribution of pravastatin at the end of experiment was as follows: 14 ± 5% of the drug was retained by the tissue, 68 ± 5% remained in the maternal circuit, and 18 ± 4% was transferred to the fetal circuit. The normalized transfer of pravastatin (clearance index) to antipyrine in the fetal-to-maternal direction (0.48 ± 0.07) was higher than its transfer in the maternal-to-fetal direction (0.36 ± 0.07, P < .01). Furthermore, pravastatin inhibited the adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-dependent uptake of the paclitaxel and estrone sulfate.

conclusionThe transfer of pravastatin across the dually perfused placental lobule suggests that fetal exposure to pravastatin is plausible. The higher transfer of pravastatin in the fetal-to-maternal direction than the reverse as well as its inhibition of the ATP-dependent uptake of [(3)H]-paclitaxel and [(3)H]-estrone sulfate strongly suggest the involvement of efflux transporters in decreasing its transfer across the placenta and support pravastatin's favorable pharmacokinetic profile in pregnancy.

Indexed as

Maternal-Fetal ExchangeFemaleHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsPlacentaPravastatinPregnancyHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsPravastatinpravastatinpreeclampsiapregnancytransplacental transfer

Identifiers

PMID24070396
PMCPMC3891837
OpenAlexW2023685096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.