Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24070329›Full record

ArticleNeurological research2013

Patients undergoing surgery of intracranial metastases have different outcomes based on their primary pathology.

Kaisorn L Chaichana, Shekhar Gadkaree, Karthik Rao, Thomas Link, Daniele Rigamonti, Michael Purtell, Ilene Browner, Jon Weingart, Alessandro Olivi, Gary Gallia and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Neoplastic nerve lesions.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. The role of astrocytes in the progression of brain cancer: complicating the picture of the tumor microenvironment.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2016
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kaisorn L ChaichanaJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Shekhar Gadkaree
Karthik Rao
Thomas Link
Daniele Rigamonti
Michael Purtell
Ilene Browner
Jon Weingart
Alessandro Olivi
Gary Gallia
Chetan Bettegowda
Henry Brem
Michael Lim
Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Translational Research Central ServicesP30CA006973 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Rosalie Wollett · 1985 to 2026
$208.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPatients with a variety of different primary cancers can develop intracranial metastases. Patients who develop intracranial metastases are often grouped into the same study population, and therefore an understanding of outcomes for patients with different primary cancers remain unclear.

methodsAdults who underwent intracranial metastatic tumor surgery from 1997-2011 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Primary pathologies were compared using Fisher's exact and Student's t-test, and Cox regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with survival.

resultsAbout 708 patients underwent surgery during the reviewed period, where 269 (38%) had non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), 106 (15%) breast cancer (BC), 72 (10%) gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, 88 (12%) renal cell cancer (RCC), and 88 (12%) melanoma. The most notable differences were that NSCLC patients were older, BC younger, BC had more primary tumor control, and NSCLC less extracranial spread. BC had longer survival, RCC had longer local progression free survival (PFS), and NSCLC had longer distal PFS. The factors independently associated with survival for NSCLC (female, recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class, primary tumor control, solitary metastasis, tumor size, adenocarcinoma, radiation, discharge to home), BC (age, no skull base involvement, radiation), GI cancer (age, RPA class, Karnofsky performance scale (KPS), lack of preoperative motor deficit, non-esophageal tumors, non-hemorrhagic tumors, avoidance of new deficits), melanoma (preoperative seizures, solitary metastasis, smaller tumor size, discharge to home, chemotherapy), and RCC (KPS, chemotherapy) were distinctly different. DISCUSSION: These differences between patients with different primary cancers support the fact that patients with intracranial disease are not all the same and should be studied by their primary pathology.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrain NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleGastrointestinal NeoplasmsHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSecondary Prevention

Identifiers

PMID24070329
PMCPMC3994530
OpenAlexW1983438711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.