ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2013
Intracranial stenting for severe symptomatic stenosis: self-expandable versus balloon-expandable stents.
Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Drug-eluting stent versus bare metal stent for symptomatic intracranial stenosis: a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis study.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Balloon-mounting stent for intracranial arterial stenosis: A comprehensive and comparative systematic review and meta-analysis.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2023Pooled it
- Identifying risk factors for in-stent restenosis in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Pooled it
- Incidence and Risk Factors of In-Stent Restenosis for Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2020Pooled it
- Reperfusion injury from a haemodynamic standpoint and role of pressure-controlled reperfusion in avoiding reperfusion injury.European heart journal open · 2026Review
- Endovascular Treatment in Symptomatic Intracranial Artery Stenosis: Experience from Two Centers.Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni · 2024Article
- The effectiveness of enterprise stent use on the treatment of intracranial atherosclerosis disease.The neuroradiology journal · 2022Article
- A retrospective study of individualized endovascular treatment for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis in patients with ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Direct Stenting of Intracranial Atherosclerosis-related Acute Large Vessel Occlusion.Clinical neuroradiology · 2021Article
- Recurrent in-stent thrombosis following V4 segment of vertebral artery stenting: A case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2021Article
- Article
- Medium-term results of undersized angioplasty and stenting for symptomatic high-grade intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis with Enterprise.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2019Article
- Endovascular treatment for symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2018Article
- Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis: Current Debates and Future Prospects.Frontiers in neurology · 2018Article
- Outcomes of middle cerebral artery angioplasty and stenting with Wingspan at a high-volume center.Neuroradiology · 2016Article
- Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting for severe stenosis of the intracranial extradural internal carotid artery causing transient ischemic attack or minor stroke.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intracranial atherosclerosis against optimal medical treatment requires reperfusion therapy to improve the clinical outcome. We compared outcomes between self-expandable stent (SES) and/or balloon-expandable stent (BES) and present the potential advantages of using each stent. During the same time frame before and after Wingspan introduction to our institute, 115 consecutive patients underwent intracranial stenting for symptomatic severe intracranial stenosis against optimal medical treatment using BES alone (n = 71) vs. BES or SES (n = 44). We analyzed 15 factors including outcome related to an adverse event (AE), modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and restenosis at six months and retrospectively compared the potential advantages of using each stent. BES or SES groups had a significantly lower AE rate (2.3%) than the BES only group (14%) (P = 0.049) revealing mRS of ≤ 2 in all patients at six months compared to 93% of the patients in the BES group. Analysis of BES or SES subgroups revealed that BES was associated with less residual stenosis after stenting than SES (18 vs. 32%; P < 0.001). Both SES and BES can improve the clinical outcome of intracranial stenting especially with a selective choice of SES or BES. Further study is needed to analyse the difference in long-term outcome and the restenosis rate between SES and BES.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.