Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24070065›Full record

ArticleBMC anesthesiology2013

The aPC treatment improves microcirculation in severe sepsis/septic shock syndrome.

Abele Donati, Elisa Damiani, Laura Botticelli, Erica Adrario, Maria Rita Lombrano, Roberta Domizi, Benedetto Marini, Jurgen Wge Van Teeffelen, Paola Carletti, Massimo Girardis and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01806428 (THE Activated Protein C), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01806428 completednot on this map

THE Activated Protein C (aPC) TREATMENT IMPROVES MICROCIRCULATION IN SEVERE SEPSIS/ SEPTIC SHOCK SYNDROME

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversità Politecnica delle MarcheRan2009 to 2011Enrolled22ConditionsSevere Sepsis, Septic Shock
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. THE ENDOTHELIUM IN SEPSIS.Shock (Augusta, Ga.) · 2016
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Abele DonatiAnesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Department of Biomedical Science and Public Health, Università Politecnica delle Marche, via Tronto 10, 60126 Torrette di Ancona, Italy. a.donati@univpm.it.
Elisa Damiani
Laura Botticelli
Erica Adrario
Maria Rita Lombrano
Roberta Domizi
Benedetto Marini
Jurgen Wge Van Teeffelen
Paola Carletti
Massimo Girardis
Paolo Pelaia
Can Ince
Marche Polytechnic University · ITUniversity of Amsterdam · NLMaastricht University · NLUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe role of recombinant activated protein C (aPC) during sepsis is still controversial. It showed anti-inflammatory effect and improved the microvascular perfusion in experimental models of septic shock. The present study was aimed at testing the hypothesis that recombinant aPC therapy improves the microcirculation during severe sepsis.

methodsProspective observational study on patients admitted in a 12-beds intensive care unit of a university hospital from July 2010 to December 2011, with severe sepsis and at least two sepsis-induced organ failures occurring within 48 hours from the onset of sepsis, who received an infusion of aPC (24 mcg/kg/h for 96 hours) (aPC group). Patients with contraindications to aPC administration were also monitored (no-aPC group).At baseline (before starting aPC infusion, T0), after 24 hours (T1a), 48 hours (T1b), 72 hours (T1c) and 6 hours after the end of aPC infusion (T2), general clinical and hemodynamic parameters were collected and the sublingual microcirculation was evaluated with sidestream dark-field imaging. Total vessel density (TVD), perfused vessel density (PVD), De Backer score, microvascular flow index (MFIs), the proportion of perfused vessels (PPV) and the flow heterogeneity index (HI) were calculated for small vessels. The perfused boundary region (PBR) was measured as an index of glycocalyx damage. Variables were compared between time points and groups using non parametric or parametric statistical tests, as appropriate.

resultsIn the 13 aPC patients mean arterial pressure (MAP), base excess, lactate, PaO2/FiO2 and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score significantly improved over time, while CI and ITBVI did not change. MFIs, TVD, PVD, PPV significantly increased over time and the HI decreased (p < 0.05 in all cases), while the PBR did not change. No-aPC patients (n = 9) did not show any change in the microcirculation over time. A positive correlation was found between MFIs and MAP. TVD, PVD and De Backer score negatively correlated with norepinephrine dose, and the SOFA score negatively correlated with MFIs, TVD and PVD.

conclusionsaPC significantly improves the microcirculation in patients with severe sepsis/septic shock.

trial registrationNCT01806428.

Identifiers

PMID24070065
PMCPMC3848895
OpenAlexW2028337980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.