ArticlePloS one2013
An automated microfluidic multiplexer for fast delivery of C. elegans populations from multiwells.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Planar Laser Activated Neuronal Scanning (PLANS) System forFrontiers in optics. Annual Meeting of the Optical Society of America · 2020Article
- Microfluidic Technologies for High Throughput Screening Through Sorting and On-Chip Culture ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Line excitation array detection fluorescence microscopy at 0.8 million frames per second.Nature communications · 2018Article
- A compact low-cost low-maintenance open architecture mask aligner for fabrication of multilayer microfluidics devices.Biomicrofluidics · 2018Article
- High-Content Microfluidic Screening Platform Used To Identify σ2R/Tmem97 Binding Ligands that Reduce Age-Dependent Neurodegeneration in C. elegans SC_APP Model.ACS chemical neuroscience · 2018Article
- 3D-templated, fully automated microfluidic input/output multiplexer for endocrine tissue culture and secretion sampling.Lab on a chip · 2017Article
- Large-scale microfluidics providing high-resolution and high-throughput screening of Caenorhabditis elegans poly-glutamine aggregation model.Nature communications · 2016Article
- Microfluidic Approaches for Manipulating, Imaging, and Screening C. elegans.Micromachines · 2016Review
- Rotational manipulation of single cells and organisms using acoustic waves.Nature communications · 2016Article
- Microfluidic platform integrated with worm-counting setup for assessing manganese toxicity.Biomicrofluidics · 2014Article
- A fully automated microfluidic femtosecond laser axotomy platform for nerve regeneration studies in C. elegans.PloS one · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Automated biosorter platforms, including recently developed microfluidic devices, enable and accelerate high-throughput and/or high-resolution bioassays on small animal models. However, time-consuming delivery of different organism populations to these systems introduces a major bottleneck to executing large-scale screens. Current population delivery strategies rely on suction from conventional well plates through tubing periodically exposed to air, leading to certain disadvantages: 1) bubble introduction to the sample, interfering with analysis in the downstream system, 2) substantial time drain from added bubble-cleaning steps, and 3) the need for complex mechanical systems to manipulate well plate position. To address these concerns, we developed a multiwell-format microfluidic platform that can deliver multiple distinct animal populations from on-chip wells using multiplexed valve control. This Population Delivery Chip could operate autonomously as part of a relatively simple setup that did not require any of the major mechanical moving parts typical of plate-handling systems to address a given well. We demonstrated automatic serial delivery of 16 distinct C. elegans worm populations to a single outlet without introducing any bubbles to the samples, causing cross-contamination, or damaging the animals. The device achieved delivery of more than 90% of the population preloaded into a given well in 4.7 seconds; an order of magnitude faster than delivery modalities in current use. This platform could potentially handle other similarly sized model organisms, such as zebrafish and drosophila larvae or cellular micro-colonies. The device's architecture and microchannel dimensions allow simple expansion for processing larger numbers of populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.