ArticlePloS one2013
The combined effect of individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status on nasopharyngeal cancer survival.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Individual and community-level social determinant impact on HPV-differentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma disparities in the USA.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Preferences for life-sustaining treatments in advance decisions: a cross-sectional survey of Taiwanese general public.BMC medical ethics · 2025Article
- Multilevel Disparities of Sex-Differentiated Human Papilloma Virus-Positive Oropharyngeal Cancers in the United States.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Impact of Race, Ethnicity, and Socioeconomic Status on Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Disease-Specific and Conditional Survival.Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2022Article
- Socioeconomic disparities in head and neck cancer survival in Germany: a causal mediation analysis using population-based cancer registry data.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Potential factors associated with clinical stage of nasopharyngeal carcinoma at diagnosis: a case-control study.Chinese journal of cancer · 2017Article
- Association of Insurance and Community-Level Socioeconomic Status With Treatment and Outcome of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Pharynx.JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery · 2017Article
- Socio-economic disparities in long-term cancer survival-10 year follow-up with individual patient data.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017Article
- Observational
- Understanding Global Cancer Disparities: The Role of Social Determinants from System Dynamics Perspective.Transdisciplinary journal of engineering & science · 2016Article
- Determinants for aggressive end-of-life care for oral cancer patients: a population-based study in an Asian country.Medicine · 2015Article
- Determinants of End-of-Life Expenditures in Patients with Oral Cancer in Taiwan: A Population-Based Study.PloS one · 2015Article
- Low socioeconomic status is associated with more aggressive end-of-life care for working-age terminal cancer patients.The oncologist · 2014Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe relationship between individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) and mortality rates in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is unknown. This population-based study aimed to examine the association between SES and survival of patients with NPC in Taiwan. MATERIALS AND
methodsA population-based follow-up study was conducted of 4691 patients diagnosed with NPC between 2002 and 2006. Each patient was traced to death or for 5 years. Individual SES was defined by enrollee job category. Neighborhood SES was based on household income dichotomized into advantaged and disadvantaged areas. Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare the death-free survival rates between the different SES groups after adjusting for possible confounding factors and risk factors.
resultsIn NPC patients below the age of 65 years, 5-year overall survival rates were worst for those with low individual SES living in disadvantaged neighborhoods. After adjusting for patient characteristics (age, gender, Charlson Comorbidity Index Score), NPC patients with low individual SES residing in disadvantaged neighborhoods were found to have a 2-fold higher risk of mortality than patients with high individual SES residing in advantaged neighborhoods. We found no significant difference in mortality rates between different SES groups in NPC patients aged 65 and above.
conclusionsOur findings indicate that NPC patients with low individual SES who live in disadvantaged neighborhoods have the higher risk of mortality than their more privileged counterparts. Public health strategies and welfare policies would be well advised to try to offset the inequalities in health care and pay more attention to addressing the needs of this vulnerable group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.