Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24069155›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

A minimal set of tissue-specific hypomethylated CpGs constitute epigenetic signatures of developmental programming.

Alejandro Colaneri, Tianyuan Wang, Vijayakanth Pagadala, Jaya Kittur, Nickolas G Staffa, Shyamal D Peddada, Elvira Isganaitis, Mary Elizabeth Patti, Lutz Birnbaumer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. DNA methylation profile of liver of mice conceived byJournal of developmental origins of health and disease · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Endocrine disruptors and obesity.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2015
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alejandro ColaneriLaboratory of Neurobiology, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America.
Tianyuan Wang
Vijayakanth Pagadala
Jaya Kittur
Nickolas G Staffa
Shyamal D Peddada
Elvira Isganaitis
Mary Elizabeth Patti
Lutz Birnbaumer

Funding

SPECIAL ASSAY COREP30DK036836 · NIDDK · JOSLIN DIABETES CENTER · PI JEAN E. SCHAFFER · 1986 to 2026
$50.5M
Transmembrane Signaling MechanismsZIAES101643 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BIRNBAUMER, LUTZ · 2011 to 2014
$5.4M
Environmental Methylome in Health and DiseaseZIAES103006 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BIRNBAUMER, LUTZ · 2011 to 2012
$1.6M
Pathways of Mother to Child Transmission of Metabolic RiskR00HD064793 · NICHD · JOSLIN DIABETES CENTER · PI ISGANAITIS, ELVIRA MARIE · 2013 to 2015
$734k
Intramural NIH HHSNICHD NIH HHS R00 HD064793NIDDK NIH HHS 5P30 DK036836-23NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK036836NIEHS NIH HHS Z01-ES-103006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCell specific states of the chromatin are programmed during mammalian development. Dynamic DNA methylation across the developing embryo guides a program of repression, switching off genes in most cell types. Thus, the majority of the tissue specific differentially methylated sites (TS-DMS) must be un-methylated CpGs. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL

findingsComparison of expanded Methyl Sensitive Cut Counting data (eMSCC) among four tissues (liver, testes, brain and kidney) from three C57BL/6J mice, identified 138,052 differentially methylated sites of which 23,270 contain CpGs un-methylated in only one tissue (TS-DMS). Most of these CpGs were located in intergenic regions, outside of promoters, CpG islands or their shores, and up to 20% of them overlapped reported active enhancers. Indeed, tissue-specific enhancers were up to 30 fold enriched in TS-DMS. Testis showed the highest number of TS-DMS, but paradoxically their associated genes do not appear to be specific to the germ cell functions, but rather are involved in organism development. In the other tissues the differentially methylated genes are associated with tissue-specific physiological or anatomical functions. The identified sets of TS-DMS quantify epigenetic distances between tissues, generated during development. We applied this concept to measure the extent of reprogramming in the liver of mice exposed to in utero or early postnatal nutritional stress. Different protocols of food restriction reprogrammed the liver methylome in different but reproducible ways. CONCLUSION AND SIGNIFICANCE: Thus, each identified set of differentially methylated sites constituted an epigenetic signature that traced the developmental programing or the early nutritional reprogramming of each exposed mouse. We propose that our approach has the potential to outline a number of disease-associated epigenetic states. The composition of differentially methylated CpGs may vary with each situation, behaving as a composite variable, which can be used as a pre-symptomatic marker for disease.

Indexed as

AnimalsCpG IslandsDNA MethylationEpigenomicsMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLTestis

Identifiers

PMID24069155
PMCPMC3771925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.