ArticlePloS one2013
A minimal set of tissue-specific hypomethylated CpGs constitute epigenetic signatures of developmental programming.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- DNA methylation profile of liver of mice conceived byJournal of developmental origins of health and disease · 2022Article
- Sex-specific epigenetic profile of inner cell mass of mice conceived in vivo or by IVF.Molecular human reproduction · 2020Article
- DNA methylation and transcriptional trajectories during human development and reprogramming of isogenic pluripotent stem cells.Nature communications · 2017Article
- Endocrine disruptors and obesity.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2015Review
- DNA Methylation Landscapes of Human Fetal Development.PLoS genetics · 2015Article
- Developmental origins of health and disease: a paradigm for understanding disease cause and prevention.Current opinion in pediatrics · 2015Review
- Review
- Poor survival is associated with the methylated degree of zinc-finger protein 545 (ZNF545) DNA promoter in gastric cancer.Oncotarget · 2015Article
- The Role of Epigenetic Change in Autism Spectrum Disorders.Frontiers in neurology · 2015Review
- Applicability of the methylated CpG sites of paired box 5 (PAX5) promoter for prediction the prognosis of gastric cancer.Oncotarget · 2014Article
- The survival decrease in gastric cancer is associated with the methylation of B-cell CLL/lymphoma 6 member B promoter.Open biology · 2014Article
- Methylated CpG site count of dapper homolog 1 (DACT1) promoter prediction the poor survival of gastric cancer.American journal of cancer research · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCell specific states of the chromatin are programmed during mammalian development. Dynamic DNA methylation across the developing embryo guides a program of repression, switching off genes in most cell types. Thus, the majority of the tissue specific differentially methylated sites (TS-DMS) must be un-methylated CpGs. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL
findingsComparison of expanded Methyl Sensitive Cut Counting data (eMSCC) among four tissues (liver, testes, brain and kidney) from three C57BL/6J mice, identified 138,052 differentially methylated sites of which 23,270 contain CpGs un-methylated in only one tissue (TS-DMS). Most of these CpGs were located in intergenic regions, outside of promoters, CpG islands or their shores, and up to 20% of them overlapped reported active enhancers. Indeed, tissue-specific enhancers were up to 30 fold enriched in TS-DMS. Testis showed the highest number of TS-DMS, but paradoxically their associated genes do not appear to be specific to the germ cell functions, but rather are involved in organism development. In the other tissues the differentially methylated genes are associated with tissue-specific physiological or anatomical functions. The identified sets of TS-DMS quantify epigenetic distances between tissues, generated during development. We applied this concept to measure the extent of reprogramming in the liver of mice exposed to in utero or early postnatal nutritional stress. Different protocols of food restriction reprogrammed the liver methylome in different but reproducible ways. CONCLUSION AND SIGNIFICANCE: Thus, each identified set of differentially methylated sites constituted an epigenetic signature that traced the developmental programing or the early nutritional reprogramming of each exposed mouse. We propose that our approach has the potential to outline a number of disease-associated epigenetic states. The composition of differentially methylated CpGs may vary with each situation, behaving as a composite variable, which can be used as a pre-symptomatic marker for disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.